The role of artificial intelligence in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: towards personalized healthcare
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines advise ongoing follow-up of patients after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) to assess cardiovascular risk and manage future patient-specific pregnancy conditions. However, there are limited tools available to monitor patients, with those available tending to be simple risk assessments that lack personalization. A promising approach could be the emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, developed from big patient datasets to provide personalized recommendations for preventive advice. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, we discuss the impact of integrating AI and big data analysis for personalized cardiovascular care, focusing on the management of HDP. EXPERT OPINION: The pathophysiological response of women to pregnancy varies, and deeper insight into each response can be gained through a deeper analysis of the medical history of pregnant women based on clinical records and imaging data. Further research is required to be able to implement AI for clinical cases using multi-modality and multi-organ assessment, and this could expand both knowledge on pregnancy-related disorders and personalized treatment planning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI is becoming increasingly prevalent in healthcare.
“Indeed, AI is becoming increasingly prevalent in healthcare.”
From Integrating AI in medical education: embracing ethical usage and critical understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
AI can provide personalized recommendations.
“It can provide personalized recommendations (1)”
From Integrating AI in medical education: embracing ethical usage and critical understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Alkhodari, M., Xiong, Z., Khandoker, A. H., Hadjileontiadis, L. J., Leeson, P., & Lapidaire, W.
- Affiliations
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leeson, Paul
- ORCID
- Venue
- Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-06-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 531-543
- ISSN
- 1477-9072 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8344
- OpenAlex
- W4380077523
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center (HEIC) at Khalifa University, the United Arab Emirates (8474000132)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, artificial intelligence, personalized medicine, cardiovascular risk assessment, postpartum follow-up, big data, clinical decision support, imaging data
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Assessment, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review