The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring and Expanding on Pluralism in Qualitative Research in Psychology
Abstract
Psychology has only recently seen the acceptance of qualitative research within the mainstream of its research (Willig & Stainton-Rogers 2008) and has recognised the ending of the “paradigm wars” (...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By combining multiple methods, researchers can explore structural, linguistic and contextual aspects of accounts which would enrich the analysis at multiple levels (Frost, 2011).”
From Quality Criteria: General and Specific Guidelines for Qualitative Approaches in Psychology Research. A Concise Guide for Novice Researchers and Reviewers (2024) · cites this paper as Frost, 2011
In the citing paper
“This form of triangulation aims to achieve ' complementarity ' by using different methods, with the purpose of reducing biases and assumptions inherent in a single method to provide insight into the complexity of the social world (Frost, 2011).”
From Quality Criteria: General and Specific Guidelines for Qualitative Approaches in Psychology Research. A Concise Guide for Novice Researchers and Reviewers (2024) · cites this paper as Frost, 2011
Citations
Cites
On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405275056 · Cited by 447 · cited 1×
“…of pragmatic approaches to research (e.g., Barker & Pistrang 2005; Cornish & Gillespie 2009; Onguewuebuzi & Leech 2005), bricolage (e.g., Kincheloe 2001, 2005), and pluralistic frameworks for counselling and psychotherapy (Cooper & McLeod 2011) illustrate some applications of the call.”
BackgroundParadigm wars: Some thoughts on a personal and public trajectory
Oakley, A. (1999) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/136455799295041 · Cited by 112 · cited 2×
“…London, UK Psychology has only recently seen the acceptance of qualitative research within the mainstream of its research (Willig & Stainton-Rogers 2008) and has recognised the ending of the “paradigm wars” (Oakley 1999) with the acceptance of mixed method qualitative-quantitative research.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Barker C, 2005, American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 201, 10.1007/s10464-005-3398-y · DOI
- Cooper M, 2011, Pluralistic counselling and psychotherapy
- Cornish F, 2009, Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 800, 10.1177/1359105309338974 · DOI
- Curt BC, 1994, Textuality and tectonics: troubling social and psychological science
- Denzin NK, 1978, Sociological methods: a sourcebook
- 10.1177/1468794106058876 · DOI
- Fiske DW, 1986, Metatheory in social science: pluralisms and subjectivities
- Frost NA, 2009, Social Psychological Review, 11, 32, 10.53841/bpsspr.2009.11.1.32 · DOI
- 10.1080/14780887.2010.500351 · DOI
- 10.1177/1468794110366802 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0167.30.1.19 · DOI
- John P, 1998, Analysing pblic policy
- 10.1177/1359105304042346 · DOI
- 10.1177/107780040100700601 · DOI
- King N, 2008, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 80, 10.1080/14780880802070559 · DOI · Paper page
- Mark A, 2006, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 1, 10.1002/job.414 · DOI
- 10.1177/1468794106058870 · DOI
- Morgan G, 1997, Images of organization
- 10.1080/13645570500402447 · DOI
- Patton MQ, 1987, How to use qualitative methods in evaluation
- 10.1080/13674670903357844 · DOI
- Willig C, 2001, Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method
- Willig C, 2008, The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 10.4135/9781848607927 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cena, E., Brooks, J., Day, W., Goodman, S., Rousaki, A., Ruby-Granger, V., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241282843 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, N. A., & Nolas, S.-M.
- Affiliations
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Frost, Nollaig A.
- Venue
- Qualitative Research in Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-119
- ISSN
- 1478-0887 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-0895
- OpenAlex
- W1982158065
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Research in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Middlesex University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- qualitative research, pluralism, paradigm wars, research paradigms, psychological research methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring and Expanding on Pluralism in Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14780887.2011.572728
- The paper
- Frost, N. A., & Nolas, S.-M. (2011). Exploring and Expanding on Pluralism in Qualitative Research in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.572728
