The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of semi-empirical interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of crystalline and liquid Al and Cu
Abstract
We investigate the application of embedded atom method (EAM) interatomic potentials in the study of crystallization kinetics from deeply undercooled melts, focusing on the fcc metals Al and Cu. For this application, it is important that the EAM potential accurately reproduces melting properties and liquid structure, in addition to the crystalline properties most commonly fit in its development. To test the accuracy of previously published EAM potentials and to guide the development of new potential in this work, first-principles calculations have been performed and new experimental measurements of the Al and Cu liquid structure factors have been undertaken by X-ray diffraction. We demonstrate that the previously published EAM potentials predict a liquid structure that is too strongly ordered relative to measured diffraction data. We develop new EAM potentials for Al and Cu to improve the agreement with the first-principles and measured liquid diffraction data. Furthermore, we calculate liquid-phase diffusivities and find that this quantity correlates well with the liquid structure. Finally, we perform molecular dynamics simulations of crystal nucleation from the melt during quenching at constant cooling rate. We find that EAM potentials, which predict the same zero-temperature crystal properties but different liquid structures, can lead to quite different crystallization kinetics. More interestingly, we find that two potentials predicting very similar equilibrium solid and liquid properties can still produce very different crystallization kinetics under far-from-equilibrium conditions characteristic of the rapid quenching simulations employed here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Melting line of aluminum from simulations of coexisting phases
Morris, J. R., Wang, C. Z., Ho, K. M., & Chan, C. T. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.3109 · Cited by 558
Cited by
A fully automated approach to calculate the melting temperature of elemental crystals
Zhu, L.-F., Janssen, J., Ishibashi, S., Körmann, F., Grabowski, B., & Neugebauer, J. (2021) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110065 · Cited by 47
Enhancing high-fidelity neural network potentials through low-fidelity sampling
Jung, G. S. (2024) · APL Machine Learning · doi:10.1063/5.0222779 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendelev, M. I., Kramer, M. J., Becker, C. A., & Asta, M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Magazine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04-21
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1723-1750
- ISSN
- 1478-6433 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6435
- 1478-6443
- OpenAlex
- W1979198964
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of semi-empirical interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of crystalline and liquid Al and Cu. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14786430802206482
- The paper
- Mendelev, M. I., Kramer, M. J., Becker, C. A., & Asta, M. (2008). Analysis of semi-empirical interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of crystalline and liquid Al and Cu. Philosophical Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430802206482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.