Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

III. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum

Williamson, G. K., Smallman, R. E.·1956·Philosophical Magazine

Abstract

Two basic equations are derived for deducing the dislocation density in powdered materials from the particle size and strain breadth measured from the Debye-Schemer spectrum. In the particle size estimate, it is assumed that the material has a block structure similar to that found in microbeam studies and that the dislocations lie along the block surfaces. The number of dislocations along each face, n, is not known. In the strain broadening estimate the x-ray line broadening from a dislocation array is calculated in terms of the broadening due to an isolated dislocation and a strain energy factor F, which allows for the effect of dislocation arrangement. Both methods involve an unknown quantity but by equating the two results it is possible in most cases to get both a narrow bracket for the dislocation density and considerable information on the dislocation arrangement. In annealed metals the values of p range from 2 × 107 cm of dislocation line per cm3 for aluminium to 3 × 108 for tungsten and molybdenum, the majority of dislocations being ‘random’, i.e. the number along each edge is approximately 1. There is some correlation between p and the purity and annealing treatment of the powder. High purity and high annealing temperatures result in smaller dislocation densities. In cold-worked metals the dislocation density is more variable. A precise analysis is possible for aluminium; high purity aluminium filed at room temperature gives p=4·5 to 7·6 × 109 with evidence for recovery, possibly by polygonization. Commercially pure aluminium filed at both room temperature and liquid air give p = 5 × 109 to 2·7 × 1010 and p = 1·5 × 1010 to 3·2 × 1011 respectively. Some dislocation array such as a ‘pile-up’, which causes an increase in the strain energy of dislocations exists in both these samples as with all the other metals examined. Dislocation densities are also given for tungsten, molybdenum, iron and α-brass. In α-brass, the only alloy considered, p is higher than for the pure metals and there is strong evidence that the dislocations are effectively random and that each dislocation is attached to a stacking fault.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14786435608238074

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 3,286

Metadata

Authors
Williamson, G. K., & Smallman, R. E.
Venue
Philosophical Magazine
Published
1956-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
34-46
ISSN
0031-8086 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014976987
Cited by
3,286
References
1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: III. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14786435608238074
The paper
Williamson, G. K., & Smallman, R. E. (1956). III. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum. Philosophical Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435608238074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.