Cited by 27Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

Use of 1,3-β-D-glucan in invasive fungal diseases in hematology patients

Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto, Del Bono, Valerio, Viscoli, Claudio, Mikulska, Malgorzata·2017·Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hematology patients. Within a diagnostic-driven approach, the use of the serum (1,3)-ß-D-glucan (BDG) test represents a valid tool for the early diagnosis and treatment of IFD. Areas covered: The available literature on the use of BDG in hematology patients was systematically retrieved. Then, it was reviewed and discussed, to identify key issues pertaining to a clinically-oriented narrative presentation of the topic. Expert commentary: The use of BDG in hematology patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis (IA) is secondary to the use of galactomannan. However, since BDG is not specific for IA, it offers an advantage of diagnosing also other IFD, such as candidiasis and pneumocystosis. The limitations of BDG include high costs and lower sensitivity in hematology patients compared to other cohorts. The risk of false positive results is possibly lower in real life than in theory, since glucan-free equipment is available and modern dialysis membranes and blood products usually do not release BDG. Thus, in experienced hands and selected clinical situations, BDG is a useful diagnostic tool, particularly due to short turnover time to results and versatility in diagnosing different IFD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14787210.2017.1401467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • β1,3 glucan is a fungal polysaccharide not specific for Aspergillus.

    “The detection of β1,3 glucan, a fungal polysaccharide not specific for Aspergillus, is based on a very different approach (132–134).”

    From Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 (2019) · cites this paper as [134]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 158 · Cited by 27

Authors
Giacobbe, D. R., Del Bono, V., Viscoli, C., & Mikulska, M.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Infectious Diseases Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l’Oncologia, University of Genoa, DISSAL, Genoa, Italy
Venue
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
Published
2017-11-20
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1101-1112
ISSN
  • 1478-7210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8336
OpenAlex
W2768091319
Cited by
27
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
β-1,3-glucan, invasive fungal infections, hematologic patients, invasive aspergillosis, candidiasis, pneumocystosis, fungal biomarkers, early diagnosis, galactomannan, false positives
MeSH terms
Invasive Fungal Infections, Humans, Proteoglycans, beta-Glucans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review