Cited by 69Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The power of proteomics to monitor senescence-associated secretory phenotypes and beyond: toward clinical applications

Open access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cellular senescence is a rapidly growing field with potential relevance for the treatment of multiple human diseases. In the last decade, cellular senescence and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) have emerged as central drivers of aging and many chronic diseases, including cancer, neurodegeneration, heart disease and osteoarthritis. Major efforts are underway to develop drugs that selectively eliminate senescent cells (senolytics) or alter the SASP (senomorphics) to treat age-related diseases in humans. The translation of senescence-targeting therapies into humans is still in early stages. Nonetheless, it is clear that proteomic approaches will facilitate the discovery of important SASP proteins, development of senescence- and SASP-derived biomarkers, and identification of therapeutic targets for senolytic and senomorphic drugs. AREAS COVERED: We review recent proteomic studies of cellular senescence and their translational relevance and, particularly, characterization of the secretory phenotype and preclinical development of biomarkers (from 2008-2020, PubMed). We focus on emerging areas, such as the heterogeneity of senescent cells and the SASP, extracellular vesicles released by senescent cells, and validating biomarkers of aging in vivo. EXPERT OPINION: Proteomic and multi-omic approaches will be important for the development of senescence-based biomarkers to facilitate and monitor future therapeutic interventions that target senescent cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14789450.2020.1766976

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SASP is heterogeneous depending on the cell type and the inducer of senescence.

    “The SASP includes pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and proteases (Coppé et al., 2008) and is heterogenous depending on the cell type and the inducer of senescence (Basisty et al., 2020).”

    From DNA damage-how and why we age? (2021) · cites this paper as Basisty et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 141 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ferrucci L, 2019, Aging Cell, e13080
  2. 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02151-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. J-P C, 2010, PLoS ONE, 5
  4. Ohkouchi S, 2015, Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine, 9, 91
  5. Mulcahy LA, 2014, J Extracell Vesicles, 3
  6. Jablonska J, Proteomes
  7. Ludwig N, Int J Mol Sci, ;20(19)
  8. Covarrubias AJ, 2019, bioRxiv, 609438
  9. Waas M, 2019, bioRxiv, 575969
  10. Xie X, 2020, J Vis Exp, 27, 156

Metadata

Authors
Basisty, N., Kale, A., Patel, S., Campisi, J., & Schilling, B.
Affiliations
Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
Schilling, Birgit
Venue
Expert Review of Proteomics
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
297-308
ISSN
  • 1478-9450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8387
OpenAlex
W3027623100
Cited by
69
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1S10OD016281)
  • National Institutes of Health (K99AG065484, P01AG017242, R01AG051729, U01AG060906, U01AG060906-02S1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cellular senescence, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, proteomics, senolytics, senescence biomarkers, aging, extracellular vesicles, age-related diseases, multi-omics, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Phenotype, Cellular Senescence, Proteome, Proteomics, Exosomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review