Associations between ward climate and patient characteristics in a secure forensic mental health service
Abstract
Ward climate is associated with patient satisfaction and, potentially, with improved outcomes but increased understanding of its relationship with individual patient characteristics is required. We investigated relationships between patient (N = 63) gender, perceived risk, risk behaviour, therapeutic engagement (session attendance), psychopathology and ward climate in a forensic psychiatric hospital. Lower security levels were significantly associated with better patient cohesion (PC), experienced safety (ES) and therapeutic hold (TH). Female gender predicted PC and ES. Higher perceived risk was associated with lower PC after controlling for security level and gender. Diagnosis of personality disorder or psychosis was associated with higher ES. Lower levels of engagement predicted greater TH. The relationship between patient characteristics and ward climate in forensic settings is complex. Prospective studies are needed to further establish determinants of ward climate, particularly those aspects of patient risk that are associated with poorer PC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Dickens, G. L., Suesse, M., Snyman, P., & Picchioni, M.
- Affiliations
- St Andrew's Healthcare (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dickens, Geoffrey L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-211
- ISSN
- 1478-9949 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-9957
- OpenAlex
- W2108760332
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- ward climate, forensic psychiatric hospitals, risk perception, risk-taking, treatment engagement, gender differences, personality disorders, psychosis, psychopathology, patient characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review