The relationship between psychopathy and sexual sadism: a mixed-methods study
Abstract
Psychopathy and sexual sadism are amongst the most controversial concepts of our times. The two forensically related constructs have often been associated at a theoretical and a clinical level. Very few studies, however, have sought to empirically assess the relationship between sexual sadism and psychopathy, and even fewer have explored the function of sadistic aggression within the construct of psychopathy. The current study followed a mixed-method design involving paper-based questionnaires, behavioural scales, and a semi-structured interview. Based on a sample of 59 forensic mental health patients and prisoners with a mean age of 41.01 years (SD = 10.30), the results indicate that psychopathy is significantly associated with both sexual sadism and trait sadism. Sexual sadists achieved higher psychopathy scores when compared to non-sexual sadists. Thematic analysis revealed differences in the function of aggression between sadistic and non-sadistic psychopaths. Three themes were identified: (a) The function of aggression, (b) Predatory fantasies, and (c) Victim – perpetrator dynamics. The findings of the study appear to support the hypothesis of the existence of sadistic psychopathy as a distinct subtype of the psychopathic disorder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sadistic aggression arises from the desire for absolute control and domination over others-seeking pleasure through cruelty, torture, and humiliation to assert power.
“Sadistic aggression arises from the desire for absolute control and domination over others—seeking pleasure through cruelty, torture, and humiliation to assert power (Papagathonikou and Marono, 2025).”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as Papagathonikou and Marono, 2025
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 · Cited by 12,033 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Participant selection was based on the a priori thematic saturation model (Saunders et al., 2017).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology
Wang, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1646601 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Papagathonikou, T., & Marono, A.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Social-Engineer, LLC
- Corresponding author
- Papagathonikou, Theodoros
- Venue
- The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-429
- ISSN
- 1478-9949 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-9957
- OpenAlex
- W4407224487
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- psychopathy, sexual sadism, prisoners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review