The Meaning and Consequences of Perceived Discrimination in Disadvantaged and Privileged Social Groups
Abstract
The subjective meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination depend on the position of one's group in the social structure. For members of disadvantaged groups, attributions to prejudice are likely to be internal, stable, uncontrollable, and convey widespread exclusion and devaluation of one's group. For members of privileged groups, the meaning of attributions to prejudice is more localized. Because of such meaning differences, attributions to prejudice are considerably more harmful for the psychological well-being of members of disadvantaged groups than they are for members of privileged groups. According to the Rejection-Identification Model (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Harvey, 1999), members of disadvantaged groups cope with the pain of attributions to prejudice by increasing identification with their disadvantaged group. We conclude with an exploration of the social contextual factors that can affect how the disadvantaged cope, and a discussion of the challenges facing future research on attributions to prejudice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attributing underperformance to pervasive and continuing discrimination and prejudice can be particularly harmful.
“attributing underperformance to pervasive and continuing discrimination and prejudice can be particularly harmful (Schmitt & Branscombe, 2002).”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Schmitt & Branscombe, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 532
- Authors
- Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Branscombe, Nyla R.
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 167-199
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2012795578
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 45.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- perceived discrimination, disadvantaged groups, privileged groups, social status, psychological well-being, rejection-identification model, group identification, social exclusion, currency devaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review