Cited by 532Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The Meaning and Consequences of Perceived Discrimination in Disadvantaged and Privileged Social Groups

Schmitt, Michael T., Branscombe, Nyla R.·2002·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

The subjective meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination depend on the position of one's group in the social structure. For members of disadvantaged groups, attributions to prejudice are likely to be internal, stable, uncontrollable, and convey widespread exclusion and devaluation of one's group. For members of privileged groups, the meaning of attributions to prejudice is more localized. Because of such meaning differences, attributions to prejudice are considerably more harmful for the psychological well-being of members of disadvantaged groups than they are for members of privileged groups. According to the Rejection-Identification Model (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Harvey, 1999), members of disadvantaged groups cope with the pain of attributions to prejudice by increasing identification with their disadvantaged group. We conclude with an exploration of the social contextual factors that can affect how the disadvantaged cope, and a discussion of the challenges facing future research on attributions to prejudice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14792772143000058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 134 · Cited by 532

Authors
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Branscombe, Nyla R.
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2002-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
167-199
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W2012795578
Cited by
532
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 29
FWCI
45.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
perceived discrimination, disadvantaged groups, privileged groups, social status, psychological well-being, rejection-identification model, group identification, social exclusion, currency devaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review