Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 47International Relations and Foreign PolicyCOVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, MigrationMaritime Security and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pivot between Containment, Engagement, and Restraint: President Obama’s Conflicted Grand Strategy in Asia

Löfflmann, Georg·2016·Asian Security

Abstract

This article examines the formulation and implementation of American grand strategy under the Obama administration, and how the “pivot to Asia” functions within this strategic context. It argues that President Obama attempts to secure continued American hegemony through a combination of cooperative engagement and restraint. This exposes a fundamental dilemma at the heart of America’s rebalancing: increased engagement with US allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific is fueling political, economic, and military competition with China. Sequestration and questions over American strategic coherence and consistency are simultaneously undermining the credibility of the pivot, both at home and abroad. The article concludes that this dilemma makes it unlikely for the pivot to succeed in its stated aims, unless the United States re-emphasizes cooperative engagement with China.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14799855.2016.1190338

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Löfflmann, G.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Löfflmann, Georg
Venue
Asian Security
Published
2016-05-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
92-110
ISSN
  • 1479-9855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2764
OpenAlex
W2463359041
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Security (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Maritime Security and History
Keywords
pivot to Asia, Obama administration, US grand strategy, US-China relations, US hegemony, containment, strategic engagement, strategic restraint, sequestration, Asia-Pacific security, US alliances in Asia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review