The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traditional ecological knowledge and the two—row wampum
Abstract
(2002). Traditional ecological knowledge and the two—row wampum. Biodiversity: Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 8-9.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Kaswentha remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes, water quality monitoring projects and resource co-management initiatives.
“Though a historical model of coexistence, it remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes (Ransom & Ettenger, 2001), water quality monitoring projects (McGregor, 2002) and resource co-management initiatives (Stevenson, 2006).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as McGregor, 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC). 1991.Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the environmental impact assessment process: A preliminary research prospectus, 23Ottawa, ON: AFN and ICC. A report for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council
- Berkes F., Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and cases, 1
- 2000, Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
- Environment Canada. State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference. http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/solec/what-is.html
- Lickers, F. 1997. 29–35. Perspectives I: Statement to the Chiefs of Ontario Working Group on Nationhood and Sustainability in Chiefs of Ontario Working Group on Nationhood and Sustainability, Nationhood and sustainability: Framework document, adopted by Resolution 97/20, Special All Ontario Chiefs Conference, Thunder Bay, Ontario, 16 October 1997. Chiefs of Ontario, Toronto, ON
- McGregor D., 2000, Expressions in Canadian Native studies, 436
- Nakashima D., 1993, Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and cases, 99
- Roberts, K. 1996.Circumpolar Aboriginal People and co-management practice: Current issues in co-management and environmental assessment, l72AB: Arctic Institute of North America and Joint Secretariat-Inuvialuit Renewable Resources Committees. Arctic Institute of North America, University of Calgary. [Conference proceedings]
- Stevenson M., 1999, Science and practice: Sustaining the boreal forest, l61
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
“Though a historical model of coexistence, it remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes (Ransom & Ettenger, 2001), water quality monitoring projects (McGregor, 2002) and resource co-management initiatives (Stevenson, 2006).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- McGregor, D.
- Affiliations
- Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McGregor, Deborah
- ORCID
- McGregor, Deborah
- Venue
- Biodiversity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 8-9
- ISSN
- 1488-8386 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-0651
- OpenAlex
- W2007534971
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biodiversity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- traditional ecological knowledge, Two Row Wampum, Iroquois, indigenous knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
