Cited by 215Indigenous and Place-Based EducationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education

Two-Eyed Seeing in the Classroom Environment: Concepts, Approaches, and Challenges

Hatcher, Annamarie, Bartlett, Cheryl, Marshall, Albert, Marshall, Murdena·2009·Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14926150903118342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-Eyed Seeing has been used to promote coexistence of disparate paradigms in education, medicine and wildlife health, and a growing number of studies point to its promise for fisheries research and management, but there has yet to be equivalent comprehensive consideration of Two-Eyed Seeing applications in fisheries.

    “Two-Eyed Seeing has been used to promote the coexistence of disparate paradigms across a variety of fields-for instance, in education (Hatcher et al., 2009;McKeon, 2012), medicine (Hall et al., 2015;Martin, 2012) and wildlife health (Kutz & Tomaselli, 2019)-and while a growing number of studies point to its promise for fisheries research and management (e.g.Abu et al., 2019;Giles et al., 2016;M”
  • Two-Eyed Seeing is set apart from other Indigenous frameworks by its explicit action imperative: knowledge transforms the holder and the holder bears a responsibility to act on that knowledge.

    “It is set apart from other Indigenous frameworks in its explicit action imperative-central to Two-Eyed Seeing is the notion that knowledge transforms the holder and that the holder bears a responsibility to act on that knowledge.”
  • Central to Two-Eyed Seeing is the notion that knowledge transforms the holder and that the holder bears a responsibility to act on that knowledge.

    “Central to Two-Eyed Seeing is the notion that knowledge transforms the holder and that the holder bears a responsibility to act on that knowledge (Hatcher et al., 2009).”
  • Two-eyed seeing seeks to avoid knowledge domination and assimilation by recognizing the best from both worlds.

    “Two-eyed seeing seeks to avoid knowledge domination and assimilation by recognizing the best from both worlds (Hatcher, Bartlett, Marshall, & Marshall, 2009).”

    From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Hatcher, Bartlett, Marshall, & Marshall, 2009

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 215

Authors
Hatcher, A., Bartlett, C., Marshall, A., & Marshall, M.
Affiliations
  • Cape Breton University (CA)
  • Nova Scotia Department of Energy (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
Published
2009-09-17
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
141-153
ISSN
  • 1492-6156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-4051
OpenAlex
W2019287002
Cited by
215
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Keywords
Two-Eyed Seeing, integrative science, Indigenous science, transdisciplinary curriculum, place-based education, co-learning, culturally responsive teaching, psychological safety, science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review