Previous Involuntary Commitment is Associated With Current Perceptions of Coercion in Voluntarily Hospitalized Patients
Abstract
Involuntary psychiatric treatment is sometimes necessary and beneficial, but may also exert negative effects. The impact of involuntary commitment on subsequent mental health treatment experience is poorly understood. We examined whether history of involuntary commitment was associated with current perceptions of coercion in a sample of voluntarily hospitalized veterans (N = 205). In adjusted analyses, perceived coercion during the voluntary admission was significantly associated with prior history of involuntary commitment (Rate Ratio = 1.60, p = .05). Perceived coercion was also higher among participants who were married/cohabiting (Rate Ratio = 1.83, p = .01) and among those with greater functional impairment (Rate Ratio = 0.97, p = .04). Although frequently unavoidable, the current results underscore the potential negative effects of coercive practices such as involuntary commitment, and support the importance of policies that aim to minimize coercive treatment experiences among psychiatric patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with a history of involuntary admission reported higher perceived coercion.
“Additionally, patients with a history of involuntary admission reported higher perceived coercion [14,74,75,81,89,98,131]”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Being married or cohabiting was linked to higher perceived coercion in another study.
“but being married or cohabiting was linked to higher perceived coercion in another [74].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Zervakis, J., Stechuchak, K., Olsen, M., Swanson, J., Oddone, E., Weinberger, M., Bryce, E., Butterfield, M., Swartz, M., & Strauss, J.
- Affiliations
- Veterans Health Administration (US)
- Health Services Research & Development, Department of Veteran Affairs, Durham, NC
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- ORCID
- Zervakis, Jennifer
- Venue
- International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-112
- ISSN
- 1499-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-9903
- OpenAlex
- W2026045985
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Forensic Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- involuntary psychiatric commitment, perceived coercion, veterans, involuntary treatment, functional disability, marital status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review