Cited by 9

Hard-of-hearing children's sense of identity and belonging

Brunnberg, Elinor·2010·Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15017410903309102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some AYA show an identity crisis, often isolated and expressing denial and grief regarding their HL.

    “On the other side, some AYA show an identity crisis. Adolescents and young adults who experience an identity crisis are often isolated and expressed denial and grief regarding their HL (Brunnberg 2010:9).”

    From Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Brunnberg 2010

    The Discussion and ‘Identity crisis versus stable identity’ sections report that some hard-of-hearing children had an identity crisis and that those children were more likely to be socially isolated. ‘Unclear identity or identity crisis’ describes children who rejected their hard-of-hearing identity or grieved their hearing loss. The study concerns children and adolescent perspectives, however, and does not establish these findings for young adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Allen, B.M. 2002. ASL-English bilingual classrooms: The families' perspectives. Bilingual Research Journal 26, no. 1: 1Á13.
  2. Brunnberg, E. 2005. The school-yard as a meeting place for HH children. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 7, no. 2: 73Á90.
  3. Cashman, H.R. 2005. Identities at play: Language preference and group membership in bilingual talk in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 301Á15.
  4. Demo, D.H. 2001. Self-esteem of children and adolescents. In Extending self-esteem theory and research sociological and psychological currents, ed. T.J. Owens, S. Stryker, and N. Goodman, 135Á156. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  5. T.J. Owens, S. Stryker, and N. Goodman, 29Á55. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the Definitions of Disability in Social Sciences, University of Cambridge.
  6. Frønes, I. 1994. De likeverige. Om socialisering og jevnealdrendes betydning [The equivalent. About socialization and the same age individual's meaning]. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, Universitetsforlaget.
  7. Giorgi, A. 1988. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In Phenomenology and psychological research, ed. A. Giorgi, 8Á22. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  8. Israelite, N., J. Ower, and G. Goldstein. 2002. Hard-of-hearing adolescents and identity construction: Influences of school experiences, peers and teachers. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7, no. 2: 134Á48.
  9. Jambor, E., and M. Elliot. 2005. Self-esteem and coping strategies among deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, no. 1: 63Á81.
  10. James, A., C. Jenks, and A. Prout. 1998. Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Jenkins, R. 2004. Social identity, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  12. Kannapell, B. 1993. Language choice Á identity choice. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press Dissertation series.
  13. Kent, B.A. 2003. Identity issues for hard-of-hearing adolescents aged 11, 13, and 15 in mainstream setting. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8, no. 3: 315Á24.
  14. Kernberg, P., A. Clarkin, E. Greenblatt, and J. Cohen. 1992. The Cornell Interview of Peers and Friends: Development and validation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 31, no. 3: 483Á9.
  15. Nikolaraizi, M., and K. Hadjikakou. 2006. The role of educational experiences in the development of deaf identity. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11, no. 4: 477Á92.
  16. Obasi, C. 2008. Seeing the deaf in 'deafness'. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13, no. 4. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enn008. · DOI
  17. Owens, T.J., S. Stryker, and N. Goodman. 2001. Extending self-esteem theory and research sociological and psychological currents. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  18. Preisler, G. 1999. The development of communication and language in deaf and severely hard of hearing children: Implications for the future. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 49: 39Á43.
  19. Priestley, M. 1998. Childhood disability and disabled childhoods. Agendas for research. Childhood. A Global Journal of Child Research 5, no. 2: 207Á23. Prop. 2008/09. Spra ˚k fo ¨r alla Á fo ¨rslag till ny spra ˚klag [Language for all Á language law proposal]. Stockholm: Department of Culture.
  20. Shilling, C. 1997. The body and difference, In Identity and difference, ed. K. Woodward, 63Á121. London: Sage Publications.
  21. K. Woodward, 7Á63. London: Sage Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunnberg, E.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Published
2010-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
179-197
ISSN
  • 1501-7419
  • 1745-3011
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review