CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Critical Race Theory in EducationHigher Education Research StudiesAcademic Freedom and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Racial Justice, Hegemony, and Bias Incidents in U.S. Higher Education

Hughes, Glyn·2013·Multicultural Perspectives
DOI 10.1080/15210960.2013.809301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Formal administrative protocols for responding to bias incidents are now the norm in higher education. In considering these developments, the author of this article poses critical questions about racial justice work on campus, identifies key features of an under-acknowledged institutional racism, and contributes to discussions about ways that diversity and social justice efforts often reproduce rather than challenge systemic inequities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15210960.2013.809301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alexander E., 1995, Public Culture, 7, 77
  2. Alexander M., 2010, The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness
  3. Baudrillard J., 1988, Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings
  4. 10.1177/0896920510380069 · DOI
  5. Bonilla-Silva E., 2006, Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequity in the United States
  6. Costello M., 2010, Teaching tolerance
  7. Feagin J. R., 2010, The White racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing, 10.4324/9780203890646 · DOI
  8. Foucault M., 1977, Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison
  9. 10.2307/466904 · DOI
  10. Gordon A., 1997, Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination
  11. Gordon C., 2012, AOL Jobs
  12. 10.1080/14675980802568319 · DOI
  13. Harvey D., 2007, A brief history of neoliberalism
  14. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.009 · DOI
  15. Jones R. G., 2007, New York Times Upfront, 10
  16. Kiley K., 2012, Inside higher ed
  17. King C. R., 2007, ColorLines
  18. Kinzie S., 2008, The Washington Post
  19. Kirp D. L., 2003, Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education
  20. Lipsitz G., 2011, How racism takes place
  21. Love, B. J.Bias incidents and hate crimes on campus: Theoretical frameworks and strategies for response. Presented at the National Conference on Race and Ethnicity in Higher Education, National Harbor, Maryland June
  22. Omi M., 1994, Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s
  23. Schlosser L. Z., 2001, About Campus, 6, 25, 10.1177/108648220100600106 · DOI
  24. Williams R., 1977, Marxism and literature

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, G.
Affiliations
University of Richmond (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Glyn
Venue
Multicultural Perspectives
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
126-132
ISSN
  • 1521-0960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7892
DOI
10.1080/15210960.2013.809301
OpenAlex
W2038418065
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multicultural Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords
racial justice, hegemony, higher education, institutional racism, diversity and inclusion, social justice, systemic inequities, campus climate, administrative protocol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review