The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: results of a four-week diary study
Abstract
Social media use has a weak, negative association with well-being in cross-sectional and longitudinal research, but this association in experimental studies is mixed. This investigation explores whether social media abstinence leads to improved daily well-being over four weeks of time. Community and undergraduate participants (N = 130) were randomly assigned to five experimental conditions: no change in social media use, and one week, two weeks, three weeks, and four weeks abstinence from social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat). All participants completed a daily diary measuring loneliness, well-being, and quality of day. Results showed no main effect of social media abstinence. The duration of abstinence was not associated with change in outcomes and order of abstinence did not explain variance in outcomes. Results are consistent with trivial effects detected in large cross-sectional research, and call into question the causal relationship between social media and well-being on the daily level.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, Hall et al. (40) manipulated social media use by randomly assigning undergraduates to varying durations of abstinence (0, 2, 3, and 4 weeks) and found that social media abstention did not account for changes in loneliness or subjective well-being [see (41) for similar finding].”
From Does Social Media Use Increase Depressive Symptoms? A Reverse Causation Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies
Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027504268574 · Cited by 4,781
Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research
Bolger, N. P., & Laurenceau, J. (2013) · Cited by 2,030
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617723376 · Cited by 1,705
Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., Shablack, H., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069841 · Cited by 1,596
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use
Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 · Cited by 1,500 · cited 3×
“This is consistent with recent research that suggests that the effect of social media on psychosocial outcomes is so small as to be trivial (Orben et al., 2019; Orben & Przybylski, 2019a).”
BackgroundResultA Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences
Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612442904 · Cited by 1,226
Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence.
Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000057 · Cited by 988 · cited 2×
“, posting updates, private messages) shows no effect (Hall, 2018; Verduyn et al., 2015).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review
O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070 · Cited by 560
Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Sheppes, G., Costello, C. K., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005 · Cited by 474
The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being
Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/tdienlin · Cited by 393
Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know
Valkenburg, P. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006 · Cited by 373
Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review
Radtke, T., Apel, T., Schenkel, K., Keller, J., & von Lindern, E. (2022) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/20501579211028647 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. A., Xing, C., Ross, E. M., & Johnson, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Jeffrey A.
- Venue
- Media Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-11-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-275
- ISSN
- 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-785X
- OpenAlex
- W2986891606
- Semantic Scholar
- 32ec22293e00442807bba75eec808354d48af584
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 29.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Kansas (GRF# 2177080.)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- social media use, well-being, loneliness, daily diary, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, causal effects, abstinence duration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
