Cited by 12Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorMemory Processes and InfluencesPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Individual Inferences in Web-Based Information Environments: How Cognitive Processing Fluency, Information Access, Active Search Behaviors, and Task Competency Affect Metacognitive and Task Judgments

Flanagin, Andrew J., Lew, Zijian·2023·Media Psychology

Abstract

Online information repositories increasingly serve as memory aids in people’s lives. Access to such information stores, however, can result in false perceived equivalencies between web-based information and personal knowledge, which can in turn influence judgments of oneself, of information search tasks, and of the Internet itself. Cognitive processing fluency, access to reliable web-based information, and actively searching for information are shown in a series of experiments to be associated with judgments related to metacognition and task performance. In the context of online information repositories accessed via web search activities, people are shown to (a) overemphasize the degree to which they find the web to be a ready source of relevant information, (b) overestimate their future task performance and the ease of tasks, and (c) inflate their own perceived cognitive and memory abilities. Results also show that those who are least competent in task completion overestimate their relative performance, whereas the most competent underestimate theirs, and that the availability of web-based information can inflate people’s estimated performance, particularly among the more competent. Collectively, three interrelated studies add considerable new insight regarding the impacts of near-ubiquitous access to contemporary information-saturated environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15213269.2022.2085116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People overestimate their task performance if web-based information is available.

    “Similarly, Flanagin and Lew (2023) found that people overestimate their task performance if web-based information is available (see also Fisher & Oppenheimer, 2021).”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Flanagin and Lew (2023)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 12

Authors
Flanagin, A. J., & Lew, Z.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Flanagin, Andrew J.
Venue
Media Psychology
Published
2022-06-14
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
17-35
ISSN
  • 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-785X
OpenAlex
W4282915793
Cited by
12
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
web-based information, metacognition, overconfidence, perceived difficulty, self-assessment of memory, access to information, memory aids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review