The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil using hydrocarbonoclastic rhizobacteria, applied through Azadirachta indica rhizosphere
Abstract
Crude oil/petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) are major pollutants worldwide. In the present study, three bacterial isolates - Pseudomonas aeruginosa BB-BE3 , P. aeruginosa BBBJ, and Gordonia amicalis BB-DAC were selected for their efficient hydrocarbon degradation and plant growth promotion (PGP) abilities. All three isolates were positive for siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, and IAA production, even in the presence of crude oil. The rhizoremediation ability was validated through pot trials where all three isolates promoted the growth of the Azadirachta indica plant in crude oil-contaminated soils. Treatment with the combination of the plant ( A. indica ) and bacteria, i.e., Pseudomonas aeruginosa BB-BE3 ; P. aeruginosa BBBJ ; Gordonia amicalis BB-DAC showed 95.71, 93.28, and 89.88% removal of TPHs respectively, while the treatment with the plant (only) resulted in 13.44% removal of TPHs whereas, in the control (Sterile bulk soil + Crude oil), the hydrocarbon removal percentage was only 5.87%. The plant tissues were analyzed for catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POX) activities, and the plants augmented with bacterial strains had significantly low CAT and POX activities as compared to uninoculated control. Therefore, the results suggest that the A. indica plant, in symbiotic association with these hydrocarbonoclastic rhizobacteria, could be used for bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soil.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
P. aeruginosa can break down petroleum hydrocarbons, potentially eliminating up to 95.71% of total petroleum hydrocarbons in crude oil.
“Research indicates that P. aeruginosa can break down petroleum hydrocarbons, potentially eliminating “up to 95.71% of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil” [38,234,235].”
From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1007/s12010-015-1603-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.08.022 · DOI
- 10.1080/15226514.2011.552928 · DOI
- 10.19080/IJESNR.2021.28.556238 · DOI
- 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.62-64.451 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00055-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0111208 · DOI
- 10.1080/15226510802655880 · DOI
- 10.1590/S1517-838246120131354 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcf118 · DOI
- 10.1264/jsme2.ME14090 · DOI
- Dhote M, 2017, Int J, 19, 1522
- 10.3390/app11083504 · DOI
- 10.1080/15226514.2017.1413331 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-002-8459-x · DOI
- Hameed A, 2007, Biosci Res, 4, 21
- 10.1007/s11274-008-9933-x · DOI
- 10.1051/agro:2006011 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13762-018-2087-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eti.2017.07.007 · DOI
- Kotoky R, 2019, Int J Phytoremediation, 1
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127175 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.055 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msy096 · DOI
- 10.1078/0944-5013-00081 · DOI
- 10.18178/ijpmbs.7.2.20-27 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-821200-4.00006-6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1004714506156 · DOI
- Linu MS, 2009, Int J Agric Sci, 4, 79
- 10.1007/s11104-013-1717-x · DOI
- Ma B, 2009, Environ Pollut, 159, 855
- 10.1104/pp.103.025619 · DOI
- 10.4172/2157-7463.1000168 · DOI
- 10.1186/s42269-019-0212-9 · DOI
- Nigam SK, 1994, Appl Bot Abstr, 14, 35
- 10.1080/15226514.2021.1872484 · DOI
- 10.1080/02757540412331335988 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3795-3801.2002 · DOI
- 10.1080/15287394.2015.1051200 · DOI
- Payne SM., 1994, Methods Enzymol, 44, 235
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0208325 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00119-0 · DOI
- Sateesh MK. 1998. Microbiological investigations on die-back disease of neem ( Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) [Ph.D. Thesis]. Mysore, India: University of Mysore.
- 10.1016/0098-8472(95)00001-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.061 · DOI
- 10.1080/07388551.2021.1888066 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2018.01502 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.030 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-014-3396-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qattan, S. Y. A. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01103-y · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhuyan, B., & Pandey, P.
- Affiliations
- Assam University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Pandey, Piyush
- ORCID
- Pandey, Piyush
- Venue
- International Journal of Phytoremediation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1444-1454
- ISSN
- 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7879
- OpenAlex
- W4210483815
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry
- Keywords
- petroleum contamination, rhizoremediation, Azadirachta indica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, plant growth promotion, siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, indole-3-acetic acid, catalase activity, peroxidase activity, total petroleum hydrocarbon removal, crude oil-contaminated soil, bioaugmentation
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Catalase, Hydrocarbons, Petroleum, Phosphates, Plants, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants, Siderophores, Alphaproteobacteria, Azadirachta, Actinobacteria, Rhizosphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review