The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb
Open accessAbstract
This article presents an overview and initial results of a geoweb analysis designed to provide the foundation for a continued discussion of the potential impacts of ‘big data’ for the practice of critical human geography. While Haklay's (2012) observation that social media content is generated by a small number of ‘outliers’ is correct, we explore alternative methods and conceptual frameworks that might allow for one to overcome the limitations of previous analyses of user-generated geographic information. Though more illustrative than explanatory, the results of our analysis suggest a cautious approach toward the use of the geoweb and big data that are as mindful of their shortcomings as their potential. More specifically, we propose five extensions to the typical practice of mapping georeferenced data that we call going ‘beyond the geotag’: (1) going beyond social media that is explicitly geographic; (2) going beyond spatialities of the ‘here and now’; (3) going beyond the proximate; (4) going beyond the human to data produced by bots and automated systems, and (5) going beyond the geoweb itself, by leveraging these sources against ancillary data, such as news reports and census data. We see these extensions of existing methodologies as providing the potential for overcoming existing limitations on the analysis of the geoweb. The principal case study focuses on the widely reported riots following the University of Kentucky men's basketball team's victory in the 2012 NCAA championship and its manifestation within the geoweb. Drawing upon a database of archived Twitter activity – including all geotagged tweets since December 2011–we analyze the geography of tweets that used a specific hashtag (#LexingtonPoliceScanner) in order to demonstrate the potential application of our methodological and conceptual program. By tracking the social, spatial, and temporal diffusion of this hashtag, we show how large databases of such spatially referenced internet content can be used in a more systematic way for critical social and spatial analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Swyngedouw, E., & Lefebvre, H. (1992) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/144191 · Cited by 9,639
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography
Goodchild, M. F. (2007) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y · Cited by 4,522
Mapping the futures. Local cultures, global change
Crouch, D. (1993) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/0743-0167(93)90085-x · Cited by 1,186
O’Reilly, T. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,184
"The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete"
Willighagen, E. (2008) · doi:10.59350/j4d10-0jt05 · Cited by 1,064
Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Amin, A. (2002) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3439 · Cited by 954
Massey, D. (1991) · doi:10.4324/9780203931950-45 · Cited by 942
Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems
Beesley, C. (1996) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(96)82860-x · Cited by 691
Cited by
The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods
Sloan, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781473983847 · Cited by 760
Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges
Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., Pettit, C., Jiang, B., Haworth, J., Stein, A., et al. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.012 · Cited by 749
Social-media data for urban sustainability
Ilieva, R. T., & McPhearson, T. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0153-6 · Cited by 291
Mapping the data shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the sociospatial dimensions of ‘big data’
Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.006 · Cited by 256
Self-citationSmart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance
Bakker, K., & Ritts, M. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Crampton, J. W., Graham, M., Poorthuis, A., Shelton, T., Stephens, M., Wilson, M. W., & Zook, M.
- Venue
- Cartography and Geographic Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-139
- ISSN
- 1523-0406 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-0465
- OpenAlex
- W3125448378
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 259.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15230406.2013.777137
- The paper
- Crampton, J. W., Graham, M., Poorthuis, A., Shelton, T., Stephens, M., Wilson, M. W., & Zook, M. (2013). Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.777137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.