The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Public Affairs Education
Abstract
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a trusted and widely used personality assessment, having extensive applications in curriculum development and research in the organizational sciences, including public affairs education. The MBTI is a reliable and valid assessment of personality that identifies four cognitive processes, eight dichotomous preferences, and 16 distinct personality types and may be applied to a variety of topics of interest in public affairs education, including curriculum development and classroom instruction, student career and occupational counseling, and for researching of issues and problems in public agencies and nonprofit organizations. This article reviews the author’s experience using the MBTI in a graduate course in human resource management for students enrolled in a Master of Public Administration program at large public university in the southeast United States. Those who consider using the MBTI are cautioned to become knowledgeable, qualified, and certified in the ethical use of this personality assessment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x · Cited by 1,040
Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type
Briggs-Myers, I., & Myers, P. B. (1980) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 881
A Program for Research on Management Information Systems
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1973) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.19.5.475 · Cited by 840
Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (1998) · Cited by 587
Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence
Keirsey, D. M. (1998) · Cited by 282
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Study Managers: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1996) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639602200103 · Cited by 280
Comparing Public and Private Sector Decision-Making Practices
Nutt, P. C. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui041 · Cited by 271
Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment
Quenk, N. L. (1999) · Cited by 185
People Types and Tiger Stripes
Lawrence, G. (1993) · Cited by 144
Huitt, W. G. (1992) · Cited by 116
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Allen J., 2000, Health care communication and personality type
- Bayne R., 2004, Psychological types at work: An MBTI perspective
- Carskadon T. G., 2002, Journal of Psychological Type, 60, 1
- Fields M. U., 2006, Shape your program: Tips, teasers, and thoughts for type trainers
- Haley C. V., 1994, Proceedings of the Myers-Briggs Type and Leadership: An internal research conference, 19
- Hammer A. L., 1996, MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
- Hanbury, G. L. (2001). The function of leadership styles and personality types among city managers: An analysis of “fit” and tenure . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
- Huitt W. G., 1992, Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 33
- Jung C. G., 1946, Psychological types
- Kirby L. K., 1998, MBTI manual, 367
- Kirby L. K., 2006, Type and culture: Using the MBTI instrument in international applications.
- Martin C. R., 1995, Looking at type and careers
- Martin C. R., 2015, Journal of Psychological Type, 75, 1
- McCaulley M. H., 2000, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52, 117, 10.1037/1061-4087.52.2.117 · DOI
- Mitroff I. I., 1975, Management Review, 64, 18
- Myers I. B., 1998, MBTI manual
- Pearman R. R., 2010, I’m not crazy, I’m just not you. The real meaning of the 16 personality types
- Peterson K., 2014, OD Practitioner, 44, 10
- Reynierse J. H., 1993, Journal of Psychological Type, 25, 11
- Sample J. A., 2004, Organization Development Journal, 22, 67
- Sample J. A., 1986, Journal of Psychological Type, 11, 47
- Schauhbut N. A., 2009, MBTI
- Schauhbut N. A., 2014, MBTI
- Walck C. L., 1992, Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fatimah, F., Rajiani, S. I., & Abbas, E. W. (2021) · Management Science Letters · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.032 · Cited by 36
A review on personality models and investment decisions
Rao, A. S., & Lakkol, S. G. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100691 · Cited by 29
Dhliwayo, P., & Coetzee, M. (2020) · SA Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1348 · Cited by 31
Leadership Challenges in Agile Environments
Almeida, F. L., & Simões, J. M. D. A. P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Technology Project Management · doi:10.4018/ijitpm.2021040102 · Cited by 12
MBTI and Aberrant Personality Traits: Dark-Side Trait Correlates of the Myers Briggs Type Inventory
Furnham, A. F. (2022) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2022.135054 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sample, J.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sample, John
- Venue
- Journal of Public Affairs Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 979-992
- ISSN
- 1523-6803 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-9643
- OpenAlex
- W2810120387
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Affairs Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
- Keywords
- Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, personality assessment, public affairs education, public administration education, human resource management, career guidance, curriculum development, evaluation ethics, personality types
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Public Affairs Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002300
- The paper
- Sample, J. (2017). A Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Public Affairs Education. Journal of Public Affairs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002300