Democratic legitimacy in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands: towards participatory and deliberative norms?
Open accessAbstract
The European Union (EU) increasingly shapes environmental policy in its member states. By including public participation requirements in environmental directives, the European Commission aims to open up the policy-making process and move from an administrative to a more participatory approach. Participation is considered to contribute to democratic governance, but has been associated with democratic problems as well, as the bases of democratic legitimacy do not automatically change when a participatory approach is implemented. This article uses a discourse-theoretical approach to analyze how participation in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands took shape and what the implications were for the construction of democratic legitimacy. Our findings show how market and agricultural groups succeeded in dominating the debate by articulating a hegemonic discourse that marginalized environmental demands. Environmental groups did not succeed in turning the debate around, as the participatory and deliberative norms that they ascribed to were not taken up. The case study demonstrates that although the administrative policy-making process was opened up, political dynamics limited the scope for participation. The article concludes by reflecting on the potential of EU governance to promote democratic legitimacy and fulfil participatory and deliberative norms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three important dimensions of legitimacy are legality, justification, and consent.
“Three important dimensions of legitimacy are legality, justification, and consent (Behagel and Turnhout, 2011;Schouten andGlasbergen, 2011, Beetham, 1991).”
From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Behagel and Turnhout, 2011
The available indexed passages contain the paper’s title and bibliographic information, but do not discuss dimensions of legitimacy. Searches for “legality justification consent” and related legitimacy terms found no passage establishing the claimed three dimensions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationMaking deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil
Mammadova, A., Behagel, J., & Masiero, M. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Behagel, J., & Turnhout, E.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Behagel, Jelle
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-316
- ISSN
- 1522-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-908X
- OpenAlex
- W2170594368
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 30.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Tulane University
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Sediment Control
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- Water Framework Directive, democratic legitimacy, citizen participation, deliberative democracy, participatory governance, EU environmental governance, environmental policy implementation, hegemonic discourse, environmental organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review