The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour
Wakefield, M. A., Loken, B., & Hornik, R. C. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60809-4 · Cited by 2,485
Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective
Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymaker, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., & Bajos, N. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69479-8 · Cited by 933
Lessons Learned from Public Health Mass Media Campaigns: Marketing Health in a Crowded Media World
Randolph, W., & Viswanath, K. (2004) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046 · Cited by 608
New directions in eHealth communication: Opportunities and challenges
Kreps, G. L., & Neuhauser, L. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013 · Cited by 546
Media effects: theory and research
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreasen, A. R.
- Venue
- Social Marketing Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 38-41
- ISSN
- 1524-5004 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4093
- OpenAlex
- W2064183842
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15245000214136
- The paper
- Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Social Marketing Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000214136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
