Too Big to Sell? A Computational Analysis of Network and Content Characteristics among Mega and Micro Beauty and Fashion Social Media Influencers
Abstract
Fashion and beauty brands leverage social media influencers to shape purchasing decisions, improve cost effectiveness, and reach wider audiences. New conventional wisdom has brands moving away from megainfluencers toward microinfluencers due to greater perceived relatability and trustworthiness. This study employs a novel computational approach integrating network analysis and computational text analysis to understand differences in content and its diffusion through mega- and microinfluencer Twitter networks. Findings debunk conventional wisdom that microinfluencers can best fill unique roles by forging intimate, emotion-laden interpersonal connections. While microinfluencers are more central to two-way dialogue within their networks, megainfluencers garner more affect directed toward them, indicating greater trust. Practical implications for the continued value of megainfluencers and the identification and development of promising microinfluencers are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microinfluencers are perceived as more relatable and trustworthy due to their lower follower count.
“In contrast to macroinfluencers, microinfluencers are perceived as more relatable and trustworthy due to their lower follower count (Britt et al. 2020).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Britt et al. 2020
Cites
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, J. A., Sudarshan, S., Sussman, K. L., Bright, L. F., & Eastin, M. S. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1964226 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Gross, J., & von Wangenheim, F. (2022) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2022.2123724 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“In contrast to macroinfluencers, microinfluencers are perceived as more relatable and trustworthy due to their lower follower count (Britt et al. 2020).”
BackgroundHimelboim, I., & Golan, G. J. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2022.2139653 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Britt, R. K., Hayes, J. L., Britt, B. C., & Park, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hayes, Jameson L.
- Venue
- Journal of Interactive Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-05-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 1525-2019 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025966191
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interactive Advertising (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- social media influencers, micro-influencers, cosmetics brands, fashion brands, influencer marketing, Twitter networks, content diffusion, affect, trust, two-way dialogue, influencer identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review