Journal Editorial Policies, Animal Welfare, and the 3Rs
Abstract
This study evaluates the editorial policies of a randomized sample of English language peer-reviewed journals that publish original research involving the use of animals. The aim is to identify whether journals have editorial policies relating to the use of animals in the research that they are prepared to publish and whether any policies are likely to promote animal welfare and dissemination of information on the 3Rs (reduction, refinement, replacement) within the scientific community. The results demonstrate that a significant proportion of journals publishing original research involving animals do not have any editorial policy relating to the use of animals. Of those journals that do have policies the majority simply request that the research be carried out in accordance with standard regulatory requirements. This paper aims to provide editors and publishers with the information they need to review their own editorial policies to ensure they are fulfilling their potential to promote animal welfare and dissemination of the 3Rs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The revised guidelines are in line with many journals' policies and will assist authors in complying with information requirements on the ethical review of the research, data presentation and access, statistical methods, and conflicts of interest.
“The revised guidelines are also in line with many journals’ policies and will assist authors in complying with information requirements on the ethical review of the research [48, 49], data presentation and access [50–52], statistical methods [51, 52], and conflicts of interest [53, 54].”
From The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Osborne, N. J., Payne, D., & Newman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Australia (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Newman, Michael L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-12-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 55-59
- ISSN
- 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0075
- OpenAlex
- W1985432281
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Keywords
- editorial policy, animal welfare, 3Rs, animal studies, peer-reviewed journals, research ethics, scholarly publishing, regulatory compliance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Welfare, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Animal Experimentation, Ethics, Research, Editorial Policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review