Futility in chronic anorexia nervosa: A concept whose time has not yet come
Abstract
Comparatively little scholarly attention has been given to the question of futility in chronic psychiatric disorders, with the exception of a small body of work on so-called end-stage anorexia nervosa (AN). A review of this literature provides the background for a critical examination of whether the concept of futility has any clinically meaningful, ethically justifiable, and legally defensible application to AN. In this article, the arguments for and against futility judgments in AN are analyzed with special emphasis on determinations of capacity in this serious mental illness. Parallels between the futility disputes in medical and psychiatric disorders, where applicable, will be drawn to further illuminate whether or not the concept that continued psychiatric treatment for AN is ever truly futile.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Geppert highlighted that even the worst outcomes in eating disorder treatment do not meet the quantitative futility threshold used in medicine (<2% chance of success).
“For example, Geppert (141) highlighted that even the worst outcomes in ED treatment do not meet the quantitative futility threshold used in medicine (<2% chance of success).”
From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Geppert, C. M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geppert, Cynthia M. A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 34-43
- ISSN
- 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0075
- OpenAlex
- W1892228998
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- chronic anorexia nervosa, futility, treatment capacity, severe mental illness, psychiatric treatment, end-of-life decisions, therapeutic ethics
- MeSH terms
- Anorexia Nervosa, Denial, Psychological, United Kingdom, Humans, Informed Consent, Palliative Care, Prognosis, United States, Mental Competency, Medical Futility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review