When a Theoretical Commitment to Broad Physician Aid-in-Dying Faces the Reality of Its Implementation
Abstract
Since relief of intolerable suffering constitutes the dominant justification for physician-assisted dying (PAD) laws, Kious and Battin (2019) argue, we should give access to patients who suffer int...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, particularly given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional.
“MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, in particular given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional [2, 28, 53, 59, 60, 71, 76].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Healthcare professionals' involvement or support of MAiD-MD could affect patients' resilience and the therapeutic relationship and potentially influence the patient to lose hope that their situation will improve.
“Healthcare professionals’ involvement or support of MAiD-MD could also affect the resilience of patients [60], the therapeutic relationship [26, 48, 60] and potentially influence the patient to lose hope that their situation will improve if they have the impression that the healthcare professional is abandoning the therapeutic project [23, 37].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Lemmens, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lemmens, Trudo
- ORCID
- Lemmens, Trudo
- Venue
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-09-26
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 65-68
- ISSN
- 1526-5161 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0075
- OpenAlex
- W2976480725
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Bioethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- physician-assisted death, euthanasia, patient eligibility, end-of-life care
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Morals, Physicians, Psychiatry, Suicide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
