The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For poorly soluble particles, surface area has been found to be of best predictive value [87, 88].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Porter, D. W., Barger, M., Robinson, V. A., Leonard, S. S., Landsittel, D., & Castranova, V. (2002) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00061-6 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1016/j.taap.2006.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.10327 · DOI
- 10.1006/taap.1999.8793 · DOI
- 10.1186/1743-8977-3-11 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.10.016 · DOI
- 10.1006/taap.2001.9240 · DOI
- Castranova V., 1990, Proceedings 14th Cotton Dust Research Conference
- 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90270-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00760.x · DOI
- 10.1080/15287390801997732 · DOI
- Dick C. A., 2003, nhal. Toxicol., 15, 39, 10.1080/08958370304454 · DOI
- 10.1080/009841096161951 · DOI
- 10.1089/089426802320282338 · DOI
- 10.1080/0002889718506430 · DOI
- Han X., 2009, Toxicologist, 108, 410
- 10.1089/089426802320282310 · DOI
- 10.1080/17435390701882478 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0923-1811(96)00576-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/annhyg/mel071 · DOI
- 10.1038/444267a · DOI
- 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.007 · DOI
- National Research Council. 1983, Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process
- 10.1097/01.shk.0000144130.36771.d6 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1114397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3432080 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1743-8977-2-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1289/ehp.7339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.182 · DOI
- 10.1093/toxsci/kfm018 · DOI
- 10.1080/08958370591002021 · DOI
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, Air quality criteria for particulate matter
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007, Nanotechnology white paper
- 10.1089/jam.2000.13.355 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10874-005-1662-z · DOI
- Vlahopoulos S., 1999, Blood, 94, 1878, 10.1182/blood.V94.6.1878 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.548743 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estimating the effective density of engineered nanomaterials for in vitro dosimetry
DeLoid, G., Cohen, J. M., Darrah, T., Derk, R., Rojanasakul, L., Pyrgiotakis, G., Wohlleben, W., & Demokritou, P. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4514 · Cited by 327
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rushton, E. K., Jiang, J., Leonard, S. S., Eberly, S., Castranova, V., Biswas, P., Elder, A., Han, X., Gelein, R., Finkelstein, J., & Oberdörster, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-02-19
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 445-461
- ISSN
- 1528-7394
- 1087-2620
- PMC
- PMC3884809
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15287390903489422
- The paper
- Rushton, E. K., Jiang, J., Leonard, S. S., Eberly, S., Castranova, V., Biswas, P., Elder, A., Han, X., Gelein, R., Finkelstein, J., & Oberdörster, G. (2010). Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903489422