Un/recognisable and dis/empowering images of disability: a collective textual analysis of media representations of intellectual disabilities
Abstract
This paper introduces a framework of five consecutive but potentially intersecting tropes of representation of intellectual disabilities. The framework was developed in a post-qualitative manner by a researcher collective of people labeled with and without intellectual disabilities. As many existing disability media analyses have been reproached for being un-nuanced, elitist and reductionist, our approach and framework offer a more layered, ambivalent and complex interpretation of media representations of intellectual disabilities. More specifically, we unpack representations that (1) patronize people with disabilities, (2) consolidate, (3) deconstruct and (4) reconstruct the hegemonic order on dis/ability and (5) impose an ableist normalcy. Although the framework was developed by means of a collective textual analysis of a specific case, i.e. Tytgat Chocolat, a Flemish television series on people with intellectual disabilities, we argue that it also serves as a valuable starting point for further analysis of media texts on (intellectual) disabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Media portrayals of people with disabilities have historically been absent, stereotyped, harmful or inaccurate rather than reflecting authentic, lived experiences.
“Yet, media portrayals of PwD have historically been absent, stereotyped, harmful or inaccurate rather than reflecting authentic, lived experiences [34, 49, 88, 114, 117].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [114]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation
Thieme, A., Faia Marques, R., Grayson, M., Balachandar, S., Tyler Cassidy, C., Choksi, M. Z., Longden, C., Huda, R. S., Ileve Kalovwe, N., Mallon, C., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790768 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Yet, media portrayals of PwD have historically been absent, stereotyped, harmful or inaccurate rather than reflecting authentic, lived experiences [34, 49, 88, 114, 117].”
- Authors
- Vertoont, S., Goethals, T., Dhaenens, F., Schelfhout, P., Van Deynse, T., Vermeir, G., & Ysebaert, M.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Ghent University Global Campus (KR)
- Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Corresponding author
- Vertoont, Susan
- Dhaenens, Frederik
- Venue
- Critical Studies in Media Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-09-27
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1479-5809 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-5036
- OpenAlex
- W3202186351
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Studies in Media Communication (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- intellectual disability, media representation, ableism, television series, post-qualitative research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review