Cited by 20Disability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and SportMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Un/recognisable and dis/empowering images of disability: a collective textual analysis of media representations of intellectual disabilities

Vertoont, Susan, Goethals, Tina, Dhaenens, Frederik, Schelfhout, Patrick, Van Deynse, Tess, Vermeir, Gabria, Ysebaert, Maud·2022·Critical Studies in Media Communication

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework of five consecutive but potentially intersecting tropes of representation of intellectual disabilities. The framework was developed in a post-qualitative manner by a researcher collective of people labeled with and without intellectual disabilities. As many existing disability media analyses have been reproached for being un-nuanced, elitist and reductionist, our approach and framework offer a more layered, ambivalent and complex interpretation of media representations of intellectual disabilities. More specifically, we unpack representations that (1) patronize people with disabilities, (2) consolidate, (3) deconstruct and (4) reconstruct the hegemonic order on dis/ability and (5) impose an ableist normalcy. Although the framework was developed by means of a collective textual analysis of a specific case, i.e. Tytgat Chocolat, a Flemish television series on people with intellectual disabilities, we argue that it also serves as a valuable starting point for further analysis of media texts on (intellectual) disabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15295036.2021.1979239

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Media portrayals of people with disabilities have historically been absent, stereotyped, harmful or inaccurate rather than reflecting authentic, lived experiences.

    “Yet, media portrayals of PwD have historically been absent, stereotyped, harmful or inaccurate rather than reflecting authentic, lived experiences [34, 49, 88, 114, 117].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vertoont, S., Goethals, T., Dhaenens, F., Schelfhout, P., Van Deynse, T., Vermeir, G., & Ysebaert, M.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Ghent University Global Campus (KR)
  • Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
Corresponding author
  • Vertoont, Susan
  • Dhaenens, Frederik
Venue
Critical Studies in Media Communication
Published
2021-09-27
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1479-5809 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-5036
OpenAlex
W3202186351
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Studies in Media Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
intellectual disability, media representation, ableism, television series, post-qualitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review