Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

What Mindfulness can learn about Dissociation and what Dissociation can learn from Mindfulness

Open access
Forner, Chrisine·2019·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

Mindfulness based psychotherapeutic interventions have shown to be an effective intervention for quite some time now. These intervention, however, have not been that successful with individuals who experience dissociative disorders. There is a very clear disconnect between these two fields. In an attempt to close the gap, reviewing what mindfulness might be from an attachment and human developed lens, one can learn that there is a lot more occurring in a mindful state other than relaxation. There is a level of human development achievement that comes from a regular mindfulness practice that seems to play a role in raising our young and being part of a complex social group. Evidence suggests that the end product of mindfulness is likely deeply connected human relationships and balanced care-giving abilities. In knowing the benefits from a relational perspective of mindfulness those in the dissociative world can utilize adaptations of mindfulness so that their clients can eventually learn to developed mindfulness and, in turn, have the same deeply connected relationship that they often missed. Conversely those in the mindfulness based therapeutic world can learn a lot about dissociation and harmed people by understanding the real difficulties that individuals with dissociative disorders have in experiencing a mindful state. They can learn to understand the need to adapt mindfulness based practices to accommodate individuals who have a system that is phobic of awareness, terrified of being calm and who have no concept of what non-judgement means. Both fields would benefit greatly by knowing more about the other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2018.1502568

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introspection during meditation may increase the salience of grief processes active after traumatic injury or chronic illness diagnosis.

    “This may be as a result of introspection during meditation: renewing a focus on thoughts and emotions may increase the salience of the grief processes (such as denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance) which are active after traumatic injury or chronic illness diagnosis [19–22].”

    From Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The paper’s Emotional Balance discussion (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) says mindfulness helps people become aware of and feel emotions, including grief. Its discussion of highly traumatized people also cautions that going inward can bring up painful material. It does not connect meditation to heightened grief after traumatic injury or a chronic illness diagnosis, or describe the listed stages of grief. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. A., & Anderson, A. K., (2012). Attentional modulation of primary introceptive and extroceptive cortices. Cerebral Cortex Advance Access, 23(1), 114-126.
  2. Forner, C., (2009). Psychotherapeutic creative, concentration and contemplation meditation: Examining a treatment option for clients who have dissociative identity disorder (Unpublished Master's Thesis for the Faculty of Social Work). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  3. Germer, C. (2006). Why meditate? Which method?. In C. Germer, J. Plat, & R. Siege (Eds.), Meditation in psychotherapy (pp. 14-30). Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry Cambridge Health Alliance.
  4. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. (2004). An introduction to brain and behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
  5. Lanius, R., Lanius, U., Fisher, J., & Ogden, P. (2006). Psychological trauma and the brain: Toward a neurological treatment model. In P. Ogden, K. Minton, & C. Pain (Eds.), Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy (pp. 139-161). New York:
  6. Lanius, R. A., Bluhm, M. A., & Lanius, U. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms provocation and neuroimaging: Heterogeneity of response. In E. Vermetten, M. J. Dorahy, & D. Spiegel (Eds.), Traumatic dissociation: Neurobiology and treatment (pp. 191-218). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  7. Lanius, U. (2014). Introduction: Dissociation and neurobiology. In U. Lanius, S. L. Paulsen, & F. M. Corrigan (Eds.), Neurobiology and treatment of traumatic dissociation (pp. 1-3). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  8. Lanius, U., Paulsen, S. L., & Corrigan, F. M. (2014a). Dissociation: Cortical differentiation and the loss of self. In U. Lanius, S. L. Paulsen, & F. M. Corrigan (Eds.), Neurobiology and treatment of traumatic dissociation (pp. 5-28). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  9. Martelli, A., Chester, D., Brown, K., Eisenberger, N., & DeWall, N. (2018). When less is more: Mindfulness predicts adaptive affective responding to rejection via reduced prefrontal recruit- ment. Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 19, 2018, https://academic.oup.com/scan/ advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/scan/nsy037/5032637 · DOI
  10. Ogden, P. (2012). Beyond conversation in sensorimotor psychotherapy: Embedded relational mindfulness. In V. M. Follette, D. Rozelle, J. W. Hopper, D. I. Rome, & J. Briere (Eds.), Contemplative methods in trauma treatment: Integrating mindfulness and other approaches. New York: Guilford Press.
  11. Perry, B. (2001). Violence and childhood: How persisting fear can alter the developing child's brain. In D. Schetky & E. Benedek (Eds.), Textbook of child and adolescent forensic psychiatry (pp. 221-238). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.childtrauma.org
  12. Seigel, D. (2012). The developing Mind: How relationships and the brain develop who we are (2nd ed.) New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Authors
Forner, C.
Corresponding author
Forner, Chrisine
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2896469435
Cited by
34
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
mindfulness, dissociation, dissociative disorders, attachment theory, human development, mindfulness-based psychotherapy, treatment adaptation, caregiving, non-judgment
MeSH terms
Dissociative Disorders, Humans, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review