Betrayal trauma and personality pathology: an integrated review
Abstract
Personality pathology is a common and debilitating problem for many, and among the factors associated with personality pathology is trauma. Recent research on the association between personality pathology and trauma has highlighted the role of trauma perpetrated by a person whom the victim trusts and/or relies upon for support (i.e., betrayal trauma). There is an increasing number of studies on the association between betrayal trauma and a range of different forms of personality pathology, although neither these studies nor the more general bodies of the literature on which they draw (i.e., in both trauma and personality pathology) have been meaningfully integrated. The goals of this paper are threefold. We first review relevant theories and research on trauma (definition, diagnosis, and different typologies, including betrayal trauma) and personality pathology (conceptualization, risk factors). Second, we review and integrate research on the association between betrayal trauma and different forms of personality pathology (e.g. antisocial/psychopathic, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, obsessive-compulsive, schizoid, and schizotypal). Finally, we use this integration to suggest directions for future research on and clinical application with respect to the intersection of betrayal trauma and personality pathology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inconsistent and untrustworthy caregiving fosters insecurity and instability in a child's sense of self, resulting in fragile self-esteem that becomes heavily reliant on external affirmation.
“Inconsistent and untrustworthy caregiving fosters insecurity and instability in a child’s sense of self, resulting in a fragile self-esteem that becomes heavily reliant on external affirmation (51, 52).”
From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Yalch, M. M., & Robbins, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Palo Alto University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yalch, Matthew M.
- Venue
- Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-177
- ISSN
- 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-9740
- OpenAlex
- W4404598394
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- betrayal trauma, personality pathology, trauma, antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, breach of trust, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Trauma, Humans, Personality Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review