Cited by 7Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Betrayal trauma and personality pathology: an integrated review

Yalch, Matthew M., Robbins, Abbey L.·2025·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

Personality pathology is a common and debilitating problem for many, and among the factors associated with personality pathology is trauma. Recent research on the association between personality pathology and trauma has highlighted the role of trauma perpetrated by a person whom the victim trusts and/or relies upon for support (i.e., betrayal trauma). There is an increasing number of studies on the association between betrayal trauma and a range of different forms of personality pathology, although neither these studies nor the more general bodies of the literature on which they draw (i.e., in both trauma and personality pathology) have been meaningfully integrated. The goals of this paper are threefold. We first review relevant theories and research on trauma (definition, diagnosis, and different typologies, including betrayal trauma) and personality pathology (conceptualization, risk factors). Second, we review and integrate research on the association between betrayal trauma and different forms of personality pathology (e.g. antisocial/psychopathic, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, obsessive-compulsive, schizoid, and schizotypal). Finally, we use this integration to suggest directions for future research on and clinical application with respect to the intersection of betrayal trauma and personality pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2024.2429465

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistent and untrustworthy caregiving fosters insecurity and instability in a child's sense of self, resulting in fragile self-esteem that becomes heavily reliant on external affirmation.

    “Inconsistent and untrustworthy caregiving fosters insecurity and instability in a child’s sense of self, resulting in a fragile self-esteem that becomes heavily reliant on external affirmation (51, 52).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 7

Authors
Yalch, M. M., & Robbins, A. L.
Affiliations
Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Yalch, Matthew M.
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2024-11-21
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
159-177
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W4404598394
Cited by
7
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
betrayal trauma, personality pathology, trauma, antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, breach of trust, risk factors
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Humans, Personality Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review