Heavy metal phytoremediation by bioenergy plants and associated tolerance mechanisms
Abstract
Bioenergy plants that are better adapted to metal-contaminated lands can be used for phytoremediation purposes and also can be additionally used to produce biofuels such as bioethanol, biodiesel, and biogas. These plants offer the dual advantages of phytoremediation and bioenergy production and majority of them are heavy metal accumulators sequestering exceptionally high amount of the absorbed metals into their biomass. Although diverse heavy metal stress tolerance mechanisms are observed in plants, mainly the metals are effectively immobilized in the roots or if transported to shoots, metal ions are avoided from the sensitive sites and thereby protect the plants from toxicity of the metals. Owing to the fact that most of the reviews published earlier have been focusing on the production of biofuels from the biomass, mostly emphasizing on edible plants, in the present review the heavy metals immobilization mechanisms operational in non-edible bioenergy plants having phytoremediation potential is highlighted. Growing energy plants in heavy metal-contaminated lands is a means of sustainable utilization of the contaminated lands and it also prevents the entry of heavy metals into the food chain. This review, therefore, gives an overview of heavy metal accumulating non-edible bioenergy plants, benefits of using bioenergy plants for phytoremediation, metal tolerance mechanisms in these accumulators, and future perspectives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyperaccumulators are of great interest as an alternate strategy to reduce contamination of soils by toxic metal ions.
“In addition, hyperaccumulators are of great interest as an alternate strategy to reduce the contamination of soils by toxic metal ions (Pp and Puthur, 2021; Rai et al., 2022; Tariq et al., 2022).”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Pp and Puthur, 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 131 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- P.P., S., & Puthur, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Division, Department of Botany, University of Calicut, Calicut University P.O., Malappuram, Kerala, India
- University of Calicut (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Puthur, Jos T.
- ORCID
- Puthur, Jos T.
- Venue
- Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-12-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-274
- ISSN
- 1532-0383 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7887
- OpenAlex
- W3117070029
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University Grants Commission (318744)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
- Keywords
- heavy metal phytoremediation, bioenergy plants, metal tolerance mechanisms, metal accumulation, metal immobilization, biofuels, contaminated site remediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review