Cited by 42Heavy metals in environmentBioenergy crop production and managementHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Heavy metal phytoremediation by bioenergy plants and associated tolerance mechanisms

P.P., Sameena, Puthur, Jos T.·2021·Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal

Abstract

Bioenergy plants that are better adapted to metal-contaminated lands can be used for phytoremediation purposes and also can be additionally used to produce biofuels such as bioethanol, biodiesel, and biogas. These plants offer the dual advantages of phytoremediation and bioenergy production and majority of them are heavy metal accumulators sequestering exceptionally high amount of the absorbed metals into their biomass. Although diverse heavy metal stress tolerance mechanisms are observed in plants, mainly the metals are effectively immobilized in the roots or if transported to shoots, metal ions are avoided from the sensitive sites and thereby protect the plants from toxicity of the metals. Owing to the fact that most of the reviews published earlier have been focusing on the production of biofuels from the biomass, mostly emphasizing on edible plants, in the present review the heavy metals immobilization mechanisms operational in non-edible bioenergy plants having phytoremediation potential is highlighted. Growing energy plants in heavy metal-contaminated lands is a means of sustainable utilization of the contaminated lands and it also prevents the entry of heavy metals into the food chain. This review, therefore, gives an overview of heavy metal accumulating non-edible bioenergy plants, benefits of using bioenergy plants for phytoremediation, metal tolerance mechanisms in these accumulators, and future perspectives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15320383.2020.1849017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 42

Authors
P.P., S., & Puthur, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Division, Department of Botany, University of Calicut, Calicut University P.O., Malappuram, Kerala, India
  • University of Calicut (IN)
Corresponding author
Puthur, Jos T.
Venue
Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
253-274
ISSN
  • 1532-0383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7887
OpenAlex
W3117070029
Cited by
42
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
University Grants Commission (318744)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
heavy metal phytoremediation, bioenergy plants, metal tolerance mechanisms, metal accumulation, metal immobilization, biofuels, contaminated site remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review