UNDERSTANDING POSITIVE CHANGE FOLLOWING TRAUMA AND ADVERSITY: STRUCTURAL CLARIFICATION
Abstract
Growing interest in positive change following trauma and adversity has prompted the development of a number of different labels and measurement instruments. This proliferation has led to some conceptual confusion, due to the different labels being used, and structural confusion, due to the different numbers of underlying factors proposed. The present study addressed both these questions through exploratory principal components analysis of three different growth measures. One hundred seventy six adults (113 women, 63 men), who had experienced a range of distressing life events, completed the Perceived Benefit Scales, the Thriving Scale, and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Results revealed that all subscales loaded highly on a single component, although the possibility of three second-order components of interpersonal relationships, self-perception, and spirituality, was also noted. Discussion focuses on the implications for understanding the concept and structure of positive change following adversity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- JOSEPH, S., ALEX LINLEY, P., & HARRIS, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Coventry University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- JOSEPH, STEPHEN
- ORCID
- JOSEPH, STEPHEN
- Venue
- Journal of Loss and Trauma
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-12-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-96
- ISSN
- 1532-5024 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5032
- OpenAlex
- W2072608202
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Loss and Trauma (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, trauma, adversity, thriving, perceived benefits, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, factor structure, interpersonal relationships, self-perception, spirituality, conceptual clarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review