The DOI matches its Crossref record.
If you build it, will they come?” Piloting a multi‐day collaborative research workshop within a learning management system
Abstract
Research workshops are designed to help students develop skills that go beyond the scope of one-shot library sessions. However, with more students conducting research off-campus, online, and in the evening, workshops targeted towards complex skills and competencies are difficult to offer. But what if librarians were to design and deliver intensive workshops online? By removing the constraints of time and space, librarians can bring active learning and collaboration to an environment that meets student demand. This paper describes one research library's experience with the development, implementation, and assessment of a multi-day, asynchronous, online workshop, targeted at teaching “Effective Literature Review.”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar to our study, short time-frame, targeted skills workshops that provide background context, hands-on examples, and the opportunity to provide feedback to instructors have been successful in promoting information literacy (Roemer & Greer, 2016).”
From Student‐led workshops: Filling skills gaps in computational research for life scientists (2021) · cites this paper as Roemer & Greer, 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Allen I. E., Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States
- Galvan J., Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences
- 10.7553/68-1-769 · DOI
- 10.1300/J111v45n01_10 · DOI
- Gronemyer K., Embedded librarians: Moving beyond one-shot instruction, 107
- Jones S., The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology
- 10.5860/crl.64.3.176 · DOI
- 10.1080/10875301.2013.804018 · DOI
- Rivenburgh N., Mentor Memo: An Occasional Newsletter for University of Washington Graduate Students in All Disciplines
- 10.5062/F44X55RG · DOI
- 10.1080/10875300802326350 · DOI
- Sittler R., The library instruction cookbook
- Swales J. M., Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives, 105
- University of Washington Bothell Writing and Communication Center, Integrating writing: Assessing sources/writing a literature review
Cited by
Student‐led workshops: Filling skills gaps in computational research for life scientists
LaTourrette, K., Stengel, A., & Clarke, J. (2021) · Natural Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/nse2.20052 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin Roemer, R., & Greer, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 174-185
- ISSN
- 1533-290X (ISSN-L)
- 1533-2918
- OpenAlex
- W2495908669
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- asynchronous learning, literature review skills, library instruction, virtual learning environments, cooperative learning, active learning, online students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: If you build it, will they come?” Piloting a multi‐day collaborative research workshop within a learning management system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1533290x.2016.1206785
- The paper
- Chin Roemer, R., & Greer, R. (2016). If you build it, will they come?” Piloting a multi‐day collaborative research workshop within a learning management system. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290x.2016.1206785
