Indigenous Youth and Bilingualism—Theory, Research, Praxis
Abstract
In this introduction, we situate the theme issue within a growing body of research on Indigenous youth language practices, communicative repertoires, and ideologies, articulating points of intersection in scholarship on Indigenous and immigrant youth bilingualism. Our geographic focus is North America. Ethnographic studies from the Far North to Mexico counter stereotypical assumptions that Indigenous youth simply orient away from local community practices toward “killer languages” in communities experiencing language shift, offering nuanced understandings of the ways in which young people negotiate relationships of power, assumptions about language, and diminishing opportunities for ancestral language learning in rapidly changing sociolinguistic ecologies. Drawing on the contributing authors' longstanding engagements with language planning in the communities represented, we emphasize transformative possibilities as well as the theoretical, methodological, and ethical considerations involved in youth language research in contemporary Indigenous communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indigenous youth do not get enough opportunities and resources to learn and use their Indigenous language.
“In addition to not getting enough opportunities and resources to learn and use their Indigenous language”
From Reclaiming and Learning Indigenous Languages on Social Media with Digital Activists: Insights from Lampung, Mayangna and Miskitu Youth (2020) · cites this paper as McCarty & Wyman, 2009
Indigenous youth are afraid to try to speak in their Indigenous language with elders from their community, as they are afraid of making mistakes, being teased and shamed in public and becoming impolite.
“they are also afraid to try to speak in the language with elders from their community, as they are afraid of making mistakes, being teased and shamed in public and becoming impolite.”
From Reclaiming and Learning Indigenous Languages on Social Media with Digital Activists: Insights from Lampung, Mayangna and Miskitu Youth (2020) · cites this paper as McCarty & Wyman, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Korteweg, L., & Fiddler, T. (2019) · McGill Journal of Education · doi:10.7202/1058397ar · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hinton, L. L., & Putra, K. A. (2020) · The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT) · doi:10.2458/jslat.2161 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCarty, T. L., & Wyman, L. T.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCarty, Teresa L.
- ORCID
- McCarty, Teresa L.
- Venue
- Journal of Language, Identity & Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 279-290
- ISSN
- 1532-7701 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-8458
- OpenAlex
- W2032653586
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Language Identity & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- Indigenous youth, bilingualism, Indigenous language revitalization, language shift, language ideology, communicative repertoire, language planning, youth language practices, sociolinguistic change, research ethics, North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review