Negotiating Sociolinguistic Borderlands—Native Youth Language Practices in Space, Time, and Place
Abstract
Drawing on the work of Philip Deloria (2004) and recent explorations of “American Indian languages in unexpected places” (Webster & Peterson, 2011a), this article challenges received expectations of Native American languages and language users as “rural” and physically distant and of “urban” Indigenous language practices as anomalous. With a focus on Native American youth, I develop the notion of sociolinguistic borderlands—spatial, temporal, and ideological spaces of sociolinguistic hybridity and diversity—as a lens into the grounded realities of language in the lives of contemporary Native youth. The article first contextualizes the current situation of Native American languages and language users within dynamic linguistic ecologies, then presents 4 ethnographic vignettes that illustrate the ways in which youth use their knowledge and claims to heritage languages to negotiate, cross, and occupy sociolinguistic borderlands. I conclude by suggesting the ways in which language planners and educators can reorganize received expectations about youth language practices and ideologies, thereby opening new possibilities for Indigenous language reclamation and youth self-empowerment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While in the process of learning, language learners will use the languages they speak to facilitate their L2 or L3 learning and acquisition.
“we all also agreed that while in the process of learning, language learners will use the languages they speak to facilitate their L2 or L3 learning and acquisition.”
From Reclaiming and Learning Indigenous Languages on Social Media with Digital Activists: Insights from Lampung, Mayangna and Miskitu Youth (2020) · cites this paper as McCarty (2014)
Cites
Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society
Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x · Cited by 2,787 · see citing works
Critical Culturally Sustaining/Revitalizing Pedagogy and Indigenous Education Sovereignty
McCarty, T., & Lee, T. (2014) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.q83746nl5pj34216 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Self-citationDesigning Indigenous Language Revitalization
Hermes, M., Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2012) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.82.3.q8117w861241871j · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hinton, L. L., & Putra, K. A. (2020) · The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT) · doi:10.2458/jslat.2161 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCarty, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCarty, Teresa L.
- ORCID
- McCarty, Teresa L.
- Venue
- Journal of Language, Identity & Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-08-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 254-267
- ISSN
- 1532-7701 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-8458
- OpenAlex
- W2042926085
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Language Identity & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Keywords
- Native American youth, indigenous languages, heritage language maintenance, language ideology, language planning, language ecology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review