Cited by 365Educational Assessment and ImprovementEducational Research and MethodsTeacher Education and Assessments

Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis

Coburn, Cynthia E., Turner, Erica O.·2011·Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives

Abstract

One of the central lessons from research on data use in schools and school districts is that assessments, student tests, and other forms of data are only as good as how they are used. But what influences how they are used? This relatively straightforward question turns out to be fairly complex to answer. Data use implicates a number of processes, conditions, and contexts. It involves interpretive processes, as using data requires that the user interpret the data and construct implications for next steps. It implicates social and organizational conditions, since the data use unfolds in the context of a multileveled organizational system. And, because data can be a source of power, particularly in the current accountability environment, data use also involves power relations. In this article, we put forward a framework for understanding the phenomenon of data use in the context of data use interventions. We draw on existing research and theory to identify key dimensions of data use that we should attend to and offer a way to understand how these dimensions might interact. In so doing, we provide guidance for studying the pathways between data use interventions and various outcomes of value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15366367.2011.626729

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The data use theory of action was built from analyses of several data use models and frameworks.

    “Our data use theory of action (Schildkamp & Poortman, 2015, p. 5) is based on the analyses of several data use models and frameworks”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Coburn & Turner, 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 134 · Cited by 365

Authors
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
Corresponding author
Coburn, Cynthia E.
Venue
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Published
2011-10
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
173-206
ISSN
  • 1536-6359 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-6367
OpenAlex
W2038748137
Cited by
365
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
24.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
data utilization, educational data, school evaluation, student testing, data interpretation, power relations, educational accountability, organizational conditions, school districts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review