Cited by 144Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Predictive Validity of a Continuous Alternative to Nominal Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder for DSM – V

Open access
Lahey, Benjamin B., Willcutt, Erik G.·2010·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Three subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on numbers of symptoms of inattention (I) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (HI) were defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) to reduce heterogeneity of the disorder, but the subtypes proved to be highly unstable over time. A continuous alternative to nominal subtyping is evaluated in a longitudinal study of 129 four- to six-year-old children with ADHD and 130 comparison children. Children who met criteria for all subtypes in Year 1 continued to exhibit greater functional impairment than comparison children during Years 2 to 9. Among children with ADHD in Year 1, I and HI symptoms differentially predicted teacher-rated need for treatment and reading and mathematics achievement scores over the next 8 years in controlled analyses. Consistent with other studies, these findings suggest that the use of diagnostic modifiers specifying the numbers of I and HI symptoms could reduce heterogeneity and facilitate clinical intervention, prognosis, and research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2010.517173

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperactivity is more observable in children than in adults.

    “This reflects the findings on the development of ADHD symptoms from childhood to adulthood, demonstrating that hyperactivity is more observable in children than in adults [14, 83, 84].”

    From Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures (2018) · cites this paper as [84]

    The paper’s introductory passage (labelled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) says hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms decline substantially from early childhood through at least adolescence. That supports an age-related decline, but the passage does not compare children with adults or establish that hyperactivity is more observable in children than in adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 144

Authors
Lahey, B. B., & Willcutt, E. G.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Lahey, Benjamin B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
761-775
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W1976903979
Cited by
144
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063941, R01MH053554)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD047264)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD subtypes, inattentive symptoms, hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, predictive validity, functional disability, academic performance, treatment needs, children, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Achievement, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Case-Control Studies, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review