Sleep and Social-Emotional Development in Infants and Toddlers
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among variables related to sleep patterns and both social-emotional problems (i.e., internalizing, externalizing, and dysregulation) and healthy social development (i.e., social competence). Assessments were completed at 6, 12, and 18 months across 5 cohorts of children for a total of 117 mother-child dyads. Mothers completed the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire at 6, 12, and 18 months, as well as the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment at 12 and 18 months. Later bedtimes and less total sleep across the 24-hr period predicted higher internalizing problem scores, which includes indices of depression/withdrawal, general anxiety, separation distress, and inhibition. In contrast, sleep fragmentation was minimally associated with decreased social competence but not with any negative social-emotional outcomes. These results indicate that sleep patterns, primarily later bedtimes and less total sleep, appear to be associated with and predictive of social-emotional problem areas, namely, internalizing issues, in infants and toddlers. These findings add to the growing literature on the role of sleep in early social-emotional development and suggest that sleep schedule and duration should be addressed in clinical assessment and interventions for infant sleep.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early childhood sleep problems are associated with poor developmental outcomes across neurocognitive, social-emotional, physical health, and family functioning domains.
“early childhood sleep problems are associated with a number of poor developmental outcomes across neurocognitive [4,5], social-emotional [6-9], physical health [10,11], and family functioning domains [12-15]”
From Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond. (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Mindell, J. A., Leichman, E. S., DuMond, C., & Sadeh, A.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Saint Joseph's University (US)
- Aspire Health Partners (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Mindell, Jodi A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-246
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- OpenAlex
- W2497602350
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Keywords
- infant sleep, sleep patterns, social-emotional development, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, emotional dysregulation, social competence, bedtime, total sleep duration, sleep fragmentation, separation distress, infants and toddlers, mother-child dyads
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Child Development, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mothers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Time Factors, Social Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review