Stepping Up, Sticking Together: Military Adolescents’ Support of Their Civilian Parents and Concurrent Depression Symptoms
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to assess the ways adolescents in active-duty military families provide emotional and instrumental support to civilian mothers and to investigate the implications of such support for their own symptoms of depression. Eighty adolescents from active-duty military families provided self-report ratings of emotional and instrumental support rendered to their civilian mothers. Mother-adolescent dyads engaged in a 10-min discussion of military experiences, which was coded for adolescents' emotional validation of their mothers. Path analyses showed that adolescents who provided more instrumental support and showed more emotional validation reported fewer symptoms of depression. However, adolescents' instrumental support to the mother was not inversely associated with their depression symptoms when the mothers reported high depression symptoms. Recent military demands did not moderate associations between adolescent support and depression symptoms. In this, the first study to our knowledge assessing youth-to-parent support provision among military adolescents, results suggest that emotional validation and instrumental support given at will by adolescents to their civilian mothers are associated with lower levels of adolescent depressive symptoms. Results also underscore the impact of maternal depression on family processes and emphasize the importance of careful assessment of support processes within military families.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maternal depression appeared to exacerbate the negative effect of parentification on adjustment.
“Maternal depression appeared to exacerbate the negative effect of parentification on adjustment [89,111].”
From Parentification Vulnerability, Reactivity, Resilience, and Thriving: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Rodriguez, A. J., & Margolin, G.
- Affiliations
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodriguez, Aubrey J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-16
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- S278-S290
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- OpenAlex
- W2588758254
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD072170)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH094035)
- American Psychological Foundation
- Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Keywords
- instrumental support, emotional validation, maternal depression, adolescent depressive symptoms, military deployment, family processes, mother-adolescent relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Mother-Child Relations, Parents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review