Cited by 3Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Stepping Up, Sticking Together: Military Adolescents’ Support of Their Civilian Parents and Concurrent Depression Symptoms

Rodriguez, Aubrey J., Margolin, Gayla·2018·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to assess the ways adolescents in active-duty military families provide emotional and instrumental support to civilian mothers and to investigate the implications of such support for their own symptoms of depression. Eighty adolescents from active-duty military families provided self-report ratings of emotional and instrumental support rendered to their civilian mothers. Mother-adolescent dyads engaged in a 10-min discussion of military experiences, which was coded for adolescents' emotional validation of their mothers. Path analyses showed that adolescents who provided more instrumental support and showed more emotional validation reported fewer symptoms of depression. However, adolescents' instrumental support to the mother was not inversely associated with their depression symptoms when the mothers reported high depression symptoms. Recent military demands did not moderate associations between adolescent support and depression symptoms. In this, the first study to our knowledge assessing youth-to-parent support provision among military adolescents, results suggest that emotional validation and instrumental support given at will by adolescents to their civilian mothers are associated with lower levels of adolescent depressive symptoms. Results also underscore the impact of maternal depression on family processes and emphasize the importance of careful assessment of support processes within military families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280802

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 3

Authors
Rodriguez, A. J., & Margolin, G.
Affiliations
  • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez, Aubrey J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
47
Issue
sup1
Pages
S278-S290
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2588758254
Cited by
3
References
45
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD072170)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH094035)
  • American Psychological Foundation
  • Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
instrumental support, emotional validation, maternal depression, adolescent depressive symptoms, military deployment, family processes, mother-adolescent relationship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Mother-Child Relations, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review