The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The research literature on drivers' use of cell phones was reviewed to identify trends in drivers' phone use and to determine the state of knowledge about the safety consequences of such use. METHODS: Approximately 125 studies were reviewed with regard to the research questions, type and rigor of the methods, and findings. Reviewed studies included surveys of drivers, experiments, naturalistic studies (continuous recording of everyday driving by drivers in instrumented vehicles), studies of crash risk, and evaluations of laws limiting drivers' phone use. RESULTS: Observational surveys indicate drivers commonly use cell phones and that such use is increasing. Drivers report they usually use hand-held phones. Experimental studies have found that simulated or instrumented driving tasks, or driving while being observed, are compromised by tasks intended to replicate phone conversations, whether using hand-held or hands-free phones, and may be further compromised by the physical distraction of handling phones. Effects of phone use on driving performance when drivers are in their own vehicles are unknown. With representative samples of adequate size, naturalistic studies in the future may provide the means to document the patterns and circumstances of drivers' phone use and their effects on real-world driving. Currently, the best studies of crash risk used cell phone company billing records to verify phone use by crash-involved drivers. Two such studies found a fourfold increase in the risk of a property-damage-only crash and the risk of an injury crash associated with phone use; increased risk was similar for males and females, younger and older drivers, and hands-free and hand-held phones. A number of jurisdictions in the United States and around the world have made it illegal for drivers to use hand-held phones. Studies of these laws show only limited compliance and unclear effects on safety. CONCLUSIONS: Even if total compliance with bans on drivers' hand-held cell phone use can be achieved, crash risk will remain to the extent that drivers continue to use or switch to hands-free phones. Although the enactment of laws limiting drivers' use of all phones is consistent with research findings, it is unclear how such laws could be enforced. At least in the short term, it appears that drivers' phone use will continue to increase, despite the growing evidence of the risk it creates. More effective countermeasures are needed but are not known at this time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transportation Research Record
Olesen, A. V., Kjems, E., Reinau, K. H., & Jensen, O. B. (2016) · Cited by 11,521
Association between Cellular-Telephone Calls and Motor Vehicle Collisions
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199702133360701 · Cited by 1,177
Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00386 · Cited by 1,134
Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.9.1.23 · Cited by 1,025
Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving
Engström, J., Johansson, E., & Östlund, J. (2005) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012 · Cited by 834
McEvoy, S. P., Stevenson, M. R., McCartt, A. T., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P., & Cercarelli, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55 · Cited by 594
Self-citationStrategies of Visual Search by Novice and Experienced Drivers
Mourant, R. R., & Rockwell, T. H. (1972) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872087201400405 · Cited by 576
The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(95)00026-v · Cited by 574
The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance
Brookhuis, K. A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(91)90008-s · Cited by 568
The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention
McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(93)90020-w · Cited by 472
Cited by
Harbluk, J. L., Noy, Y. I., Trbovich, P. L., & Eizenman, M. (2007) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013 · Cited by 526
Patrick, K., Griswold, W. G., Raab, F., & Intille, S. S. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.001 · Cited by 479
Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (2010) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021 · Cited by 451
Carter, P. M., Bingham, C. R., Zakrajsek, J. S., Shope, J. T., & Sayer, T. B. (2014) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.008 · Cited by 171
A Brief Survey on Interactive Automotive UI
Prabhakar, G., & Biswas, P. (2021) · Transportation Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.treng.2021.100089 · Cited by 18
“The single-mode speech-based interaction has both positive and negative effects which are still debatable due to its controversial results from studies [He, 2014; Lee, 2001; Hua, 2010; He, 2015; McCartt, 2006].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Mccartt, A. T., Hellinga, L. A., & Bratiman, K. A.
- Venue
- Traffic Injury Prevention
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-106
- ISSN
- 1538-957X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9588
- OpenAlex
- W2113967947
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15389580600651103
- The paper
- Mccartt, A. T., Hellinga, L. A., & Bratiman, K. A. (2006). Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580600651103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.