Cited by 14Traffic and Road SafetyAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data

Open access
Isaksson-Hellman, Irene, Lindman, Magdalena·2018·Traffic Injury Prevention

Abstract

Objective Lane changes, which frequently occur when vehicles travel on major roads, may contribute to critical situations that significantly affect the traffic flow and traffic safety. Thus, knowledge of lane change situations is important for infrastructure improvements as well as for driver support systems and automated driving development projects. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the crash avoidance performance of a lane change driver support system, the Blind Spot Information System (BLIS) in Volvo car models, and to describe the characteristics of lane change crashes by analyzing detailed information from insurance claim reports. Methods An overall evaluation of the safety effect of BLIS was performed by analyzing crash rate differences in lane change situations for cars with and without the optionally mounted BLIS system based on a population of 380,000 insured vehicle years. Further, crashes in which the repair cost of the host vehicle exceeded approximately US$1,250 were selected and compared. Finally, the study examined different precrash factors and crash configurations, using in-depth insurance claims data from representative lane change crash cases including all severity levels in a population of more than 200,000 insured vehicle years. Results The technology did not significantly reduce the overall number of crashes when all types of lane change crashes and severity levels were considered, though a significant crash-reducing effect of 31% for BLIS c…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15389588.2017.1396320

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liability insurance claims offer a more comprehensive assessment of human driving incidents than police collision databases because claims data have a higher reporting frequency of lower-severity collisions or injuries in human drivers.

    “Liability insurance claims offer a more comprehensive assessment of human driving incidents than collision databases from police reports because (a) claims data have a higher reporting frequency of lower-severity collisions or injuries in human drivers [1,10]”
  • Insurance data capture motor incidents that result in harm or the need for financial recovery, including lower-severity collisions and injuries, but excluding minor events that produce no damage or harm.

    “Unlike police-reported crashes that underreport lower-severity collisions and naturalistic driving data that report any contact event, insurance data capture motor incidents that result in harm or the need for financial recovery, including lower-severity collisions and injuries, but excluding minor events that produce no damage or harm.”
  • Police reports capture fewer instances of injury claims than liability claims data.

    “capture fewer instances of injury claims [10]”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Anderson RWG, 2011, Analysis of Crash Data to Estimate the Benefits of Emerging Vehicle Technology
  2. 10.4271/951895 · DOI
  3. Chovan JD, 1994, Examination of Lane Change Crashes and Potential IVHS Countermeasures
  4. Cicchino J, 2017, Effects of Blind Spot Monitoring Systems on Police-Reported Lane-Change Crashes
  5. Doyle M, 2015, Paper presented at: 24th ESV Conference
  6. euroFOT, 2012, European Large-Scale Field Operational Tests on In-Vehicle Systems 7th Framework Programme. Information and Communication Technologies. Deliverable 6.4 Final Results: Impacts on Traffic Safety
  7. Farmer CM, 2008, Crash Avoidance Potential of Five Vehicle Technologies
  8. Fitch GM, 2009, Analysis of Lane-Change Crashes and Near-Crashes
  9. Flannagan C, 2016, Large-Scale Field Test of Forward Collision Alert and Lane Departure Warning Systems
  10. Hetrick S. Examination of Driver Lane Change Behavior and the Potential Effectiveness of Warning Onset Rules for Lane Change or “Side” Crash Avoidance Systems [MSc thesis]. Blacksburg, VA: Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1997.
  11. Highway Loss Data Institute, 2011, HLDI Bull., 28
  12. Highway Loss Data Institute, 2012, HLDI Bull., 29
  13. Highway Loss Data Institute, 2015, HLDI Bull., 32
  14. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2013, Status Report, 48
  15. Isaksson-Hellman I, 2012, Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med., 56, 104
  16. Isaksson-Hellman I, 2015, Paper presented at: 3rd International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology towards Zero Traffic Accidents
  17. Isaksson-Hellman I, 2015, Paper presented at: 24th ESV Conference
  18. 10.1080/15389588.2016.1186802 · DOI
  19. Isaksson-Hellman I, 2016, Paper presented at: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
  20. 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.020 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/25.901899 · DOI
  22. Kuehn M, 2009, Paper presented at: 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
  23. 10.1037/e733232011-001 · DOI
  24. Lindman M, 2017, Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference on Biomechanics of Impacts
  25. Nodine E, 2011, Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) Light Vehicle Field Operational Test Independent Evaluation.
  26. Piccinini GF, 2012, Work., 41, 4213, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0123-4213 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/e621692011-001 · DOI
  28. Sen B, 2003, Analysis of Lane Change Crashes
  29. Young S, 1995, Development of Performance Specifications for Collision Avoidance Systems for Lane Change Merging and Backing, Task 2 Interim Report: Functional Goals Establishment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Isaksson-Hellman, I., & Lindman, M.
Affiliations
  • If P&C Insurance, Mölndal, Sweden
  • Volvo (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Isaksson-Hellman, Irene
Venue
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
19
Issue
sup1
Pages
S104-S111
ISSN
  • 1538-957X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9588
OpenAlex
W2794449650
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Traffic Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
driver assistance systems, crash avoidance, health insurance claims, accident severity, autonomous driving, Volvo Cars, repair costs, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, connected vehicles
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Protective Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review