The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Particle Resuspension During the Use of Vacuum Cleaners on Residential Carpet
Abstract
Vacuuming is generally considered to be an important activity with respect to the cleanliness of indoor environments but may lead to short-term resuspension of particulate matter and elevated particle mass in indoor air. Because resuspended particles often contain toxicants, such as lead and pesticides, or consist of biological agents that can trigger allergic reactions, it is important to understand the role of vacuuming on short-term variations in indoor particulate matter concentrations. The inhalation of particles during vacuuming events may affect adversely those whose occupation requires them to clean a wide range of indoor environments, from homes to schools and offices, as well as those who occupy those environments. In response, a series of 46 experiments was completed to determine time-variant concentrations of both PM(10) and PM(2.5) during various vacuuming activities in 12 separate apartments. Experiments involved the use of two different non-HEPA vacuum cleaners and were completed with a vacuum cleaner activated (switched on) as well as deactivated (switched off). The latter was intended to provide insight on the potential for resuspension of particles by the mechanical agitation of vacuum cleaner movement across carpet. Separate experiments were completed also using "mock" vacuuming simulations, that is, walking on the carpet in a manner consistent with using a vacuum cleaner. Results are presented as incremental particulate matter concentration increases, relative to background (prevacuum) concentrations, and peak-to-background particle concentration ratios. Results indicate significant resuspension of PM(10) mass during vacuum cleaning, with a mean time-averaged PM(10) increase of greater than 17 mu g/m(3) above background. Resuspension of PM(2.5) mass was determined to be small, that is, PM(10) mass was dominated by particles greater than 2.5 mu m. The frequency of vacuuming (between a 10-day standard frequency and several experiments at > 24 days between vacuuming) had little influence on resuspended particle mass. Resuspension by mechanical agitation (rolling of vacuum cleaner across carpet) with the vacuum cleaner switched off was determined to be substantial, with a mean time-averaged (during vacuuming) PM(10) increase of 35 mu g/m(3) relative to background. Peak-to-background PM(10) concentrations exceeded 6 for some experiments and averaged between approximately 3 and 4 for experiments when the vacuum cleaner was switched on.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even when the vacuum cleaner is turned off, mere mechanical agitation from push/pull motions alone can resuspend large allergen-bearing particles [112].”
From Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control (2025) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Pope C. A., 1995, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 151, 669, 10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.669 · DOI
- Samet J. M., 2000, N. Engl. J. Med., 343, 1742, 10.1056/NEJM200012143432401 · DOI
- Somers C. M., 2004, Science, 304, 1008, 10.1126/science.1095815 · DOI
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1994, National Human Activity Pattern Survey Data Base
- Nazaroff W. W., 2004, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2841, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · DOI · Paper page
- Simpson A., 1998, Allergy, 53, 602, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03936.x · DOI
- Bellanti J. A., 2000, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 84, 249, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62762-7 · DOI
- Arlian L. G., 2001, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 87, 296, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62243-0 · DOI
- Vojta P. J., 2001, Environ. Health Perspect., 109, 815, 10.1289/ehp.01109815 · DOI
- Causer S. M., 2004, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 1, 237, 10.1080/15459620490432169 · DOI
- Dybendal T., 1994, Allergy, 49, 210, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb02651.x · DOI
- Raunio P., 1998, Allergy, 53, 195, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03870.x · DOI
- Cohn R. D., 2004, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 113, 1167, 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.592 · DOI
- Phipatanakul W., 2004, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 92, 420, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61777-2 · DOI
- Franke D. L., 1997, Indoor Air, 7, 41, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-3-00006.x · DOI
- Warner J. A., 2000, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 105, 75, 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90181-7 · DOI
- Bischof W., 2002, Indoor Air, 12, 2, 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.120102.x · DOI
- McNally N. J., 2001, Br. J. Dermatol., 145, 730, 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04474.x · DOI
- de Blay F., 1998, Allergy, 53, 411, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03914.x · DOI · Paper page
- Abt E., 2000, Environ. Health Perspect., 108, 35, 10.1289/ehp.0010835 · DOI
- Ferro A. R., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1759, 10.1021/es0263893 · DOI
- Montoya L. D., 2005, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 735, 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.004 · DOI
- Montoya L. D., 2001, Atmos. Environ., 35, 859, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00379-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Long C. M., 2000, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50, 1236, 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464154 · DOI
- Thatcher T. L., 1995, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1487, 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00016-R · DOI
- Lioy P. J., 1999, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 49, 200, 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463789 · DOI
- Afshari A., 2005, Indoor Air, 15, 141, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00332.x · DOI
- Hines W. W., 1980, Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control
Jiang, Y., Tian, X., Fu, X., Ma, B., Wang, Z., Han, B., Tao, H., Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262210913 · Cited by 3
“Even when the vacuum cleaner is turned off, mere mechanical agitation from push/pull motions alone can resuspend large allergen-bearing particles [112].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Corsi, R. L., Siegel, J. A., & Chiang, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 232-238
- ISSN
- 1545-9624 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9632
- OpenAlex
- W2161887640
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Texas at Austin
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
- Keywords
- vacuuming, particle resuspension, indoor particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5, indoor air quality, mechanical agitation
- MeSH terms
- Air Movements, Environmental Exposure, Filtration, Floors and Floorcoverings, Household Work, Humans, Particle Size, Air Pollution, Indoor, Particulate Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review