Cited by 146Traffic control and managementVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Transportation Planning and Optimization

Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment

Xie, Yuanchang, Zhang, Huixing, Gartner, Nathan H., Arsava, Tugba·2017·Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

In a connected vehicle environment, vehicles are able to communicate and exchange detailed information such as speed, acceleration, and position in real time. Such information exchange is important for improving traffic safety and mobility. This allows vehicles to collaborate with each other, which can significantly improve traffic operations particularly at intersections and freeway ramps. To assess the potential safety and mobility benefits of collaborative driving enabled by connected vehicle technologies, this study developed an optimization-based ramp control strategy and a simulation evaluation platform using VISSIM, MATLAB, and the Car2X module in VISSIM. The ramp control strategy is formulated as a constrained nonlinear optimization problem and solved by the MATLAB optimization toolbox. The optimization model provides individual vehicles with step-by-step control instructions in the ramp merging area. In addition to the optimization-based ramp control strategy, an empirical gradual speed limit control strategy is also formulated. These strategies are evaluated using the developed simulation platform in terms of average speed, average delay time, and throughput and are compared with a benchmark case with no control. The study results indicate that the proposed optimal control strategy can effectively coordinate merging vehicles at freeway on-ramps and substantially improve safety and mobility, especially when the freeway traffic is not oversaturated. The ramp control strategy can be further extended to improve traffic operations at bottlenecks caused by incidents, which cause approximately 25% of traffic congestion in the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15472450.2016.1248288

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an optimization-based ramp control strategy in a CAV and AV environment, the optimal ramp control model outperforms gradual speed limit and do nothing with regard to average delay time, vehicle throughput, and average speed.

    “Results of nine different combination of freeway and ramp vehicle inputs (veh/h) under three ramp control cases demonstrate that 'optimal ramp control model' outperforms two other control cases: 'gradual speed limit' and 'do nothing' with regards to performance measurement indicators-average delay time, vehicle throughput and average speed (Xie et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, Y., Zhang, H., Gartner, N. H., & Arsava, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • NetScout (United States) (US)
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Xie, Yuanchang
Venue
Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2016-10-18
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
136-147
ISSN
  • 1024-8072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-2450
  • 1547-2442
OpenAlex
W2537764407
Cited by
146
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
connected and autonomous vehicles, cooperative driving, nonlinear programming, road safety, traffic mobility, delay time, traffic bottlenecks, incident management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review