Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment
Abstract
In a connected vehicle environment, vehicles are able to communicate and exchange detailed information such as speed, acceleration, and position in real time. Such information exchange is important for improving traffic safety and mobility. This allows vehicles to collaborate with each other, which can significantly improve traffic operations particularly at intersections and freeway ramps. To assess the potential safety and mobility benefits of collaborative driving enabled by connected vehicle technologies, this study developed an optimization-based ramp control strategy and a simulation evaluation platform using VISSIM, MATLAB, and the Car2X module in VISSIM. The ramp control strategy is formulated as a constrained nonlinear optimization problem and solved by the MATLAB optimization toolbox. The optimization model provides individual vehicles with step-by-step control instructions in the ramp merging area. In addition to the optimization-based ramp control strategy, an empirical gradual speed limit control strategy is also formulated. These strategies are evaluated using the developed simulation platform in terms of average speed, average delay time, and throughput and are compared with a benchmark case with no control. The study results indicate that the proposed optimal control strategy can effectively coordinate merging vehicles at freeway on-ramps and substantially improve safety and mobility, especially when the freeway traffic is not oversaturated. The ramp control strategy can be further extended to improve traffic operations at bottlenecks caused by incidents, which cause approximately 25% of traffic congestion in the United States.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an optimization-based ramp control strategy in a CAV and AV environment, the optimal ramp control model outperforms gradual speed limit and do nothing with regard to average delay time, vehicle throughput, and average speed.
“Results of nine different combination of freeway and ramp vehicle inputs (veh/h) under three ramp control cases demonstrate that 'optimal ramp control model' outperforms two other control cases: 'gradual speed limit' and 'do nothing' with regards to performance measurement indicators-average delay time, vehicle throughput and average speed (Xie et al., 2017).”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Xie et al., 2017
Cites
Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow
Shladover, S. E., Su, D., & Lu, X.-Y. (2012) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2324-08 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Currie, G. (2019) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2019.1405 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xie, Y., Zhang, H., Gartner, N. H., & Arsava, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- NetScout (United States) (US)
- Wentworth Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Yuanchang
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-10-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-147
- ISSN
- 1024-8072 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-2450
- 1547-2442
- OpenAlex
- W2537764407
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- connected and autonomous vehicles, cooperative driving, nonlinear programming, road safety, traffic mobility, delay time, traffic bottlenecks, incident management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review