A Developmental Analysis of Generic Nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua
Open accessAbstract
Generic noun phrases (e.g., "Cats like to drink milk") are a primary means by which adults express generalizations to children, yet they pose a challenging induction puzzle for learners. Although prior research has established that English speakers understand and produce generic noun phrases by preschool age, little is known regarding the cross-cultural generality of generic acquisition. Southern Peruvian Quechua provides a valuable comparison because, unlike English, it is a highly inflected language in which generics are marked by the absence rather than the presence of any linguistic markers. Moreover, Quechua is spoken in a cultural context that differs markedly from the highly educated, middle-class contexts within which earlier research on generics was conducted. We presented participants from 5 age groups (3-6, 7-9, 10-12, 14-35, and 36-90 years of age) with two tasks that examined the ability to distinguish generic from non-generic utterances. In Study 1, even the youngest children understood generics as applying broadly to a category (like "all") and distinct from indefinite reference ("some"). However, there was a developmental lag before children understood that generics, unlike "all", can include exceptions. Study 2 revealed that generic interpretations are more frequent for utterances that (a) lack specifying markers and (b) are animate. Altogether, generic interpretations are found among the youngest participants, and may be a default mode of quantification. These data demonstrate the cross-cultural importance of generic information in linguistic expression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most prior research provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than study 2 did.
“Language can signal nongenericity in a rich variety of ways, and most prior research has provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than was provided in study 2 (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [30]
In the published literature, nongenerics typically manipulated the noun phrase itself, drawing attention more explicitly to the limited scope of the generalization.
“For example, whereas study 2 only manipulated tense, in the published literature, nongenerics typically manipulated the noun phrase itself (e.g.,”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [30]
Language can signal nongenericity in many different ways.
“Language can signal nongenericity in a rich variety of ways, and most prior research has provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than was provided in study 2 (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Carlson GN Pelletier FJ The generic book 1995 University of Chicago Press Chicago
- Cimpian A Gelman SA Brandone A Generic sentences refer to inherent qualities rather than statistical regularities. Language and Cognitive Processes in press PMC2843935 20352078
- Authors
- Mannheim, B., Gelman, S. A., Escalante, C., Huayhua, M., & Puma, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mannheim, Bruce
- Venue
- Language Learning and Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1547-3341 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5441
- PMC
- PMC3139230
- OpenAlex
- W2041123118
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Language Learning and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R56HD036043, R01HD036043)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- generic interpretation, child language acquisition, quantification, indefinite reference, language development, cross-linguistic comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review