Mindfulness-Based Treatment for People With Severe Mental Illness: A Literature Review
Abstract
This article provides a synthesis of current findings from existing mindfulness-based treatment interventions and their relevance to individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). A mindfulness-oriented approach to coping with SMI goes beyond symptom management and exemplifies key recovery principles such as self-determination and resilience. Although previous studies and critical reviews provide evidence of a relationship between mindfulness training and positive mental health and physical outcomes for various populations, this is the first critical review to systematically examine the efficacy of these methods in treating SMI. Evidence suggests that this approach shows promise in reducing symptom-associated distress, increasing feelings of self-efficacy, and reducing psychiatric hospitalizations for individuals with psychotic disorders. This review also reveals several ongoing challenges in the field including the need for more rigorously controlled studies, further operationalization of the construct of mindfulness and evidence of construct validity, and greater insight into the specific mechanisms of change underlying mindful awareness. Overall, this innovative approach warrants further exploration, having been used as a component of existing evidence-based practices or provided in a stand-alone manner to promote adaptive coping and wellness among individuals with SMI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Davis and Kurzban (2012) concluded that there is preliminary evidence to support that mindfulness-based treatment provides benefits for patients regarding symptom-associated distress, self-efficacy, and hospitalizations.
“Davis and Kurzban (2012) concluded that there is preliminary evidence to support the notion that mindful-ness-based treatment provides benefits for patients namely regarding symptom-associated distress, self-efficacy, and hospitalizations.”
From Contextual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies Across the Psychosis Continuum: A Review of Evidence for Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective and Bipolar Disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Davis and Kurzban, 2012
MBI promote coping with other chronic physiological illnesses (such as diabetes, hypertension, HIV/Aids or chronic pain) and mental illness.
“as well as previous research demonstrating that MBI promote coping with other chronic physiological illnesses (such as diabetes, hypertension, HIV/Aids or chronic pain) and mental illness. 28,97-99”
From How do mindfulness-based interventions promote coping and self-efficacy in patients with cancer: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative data (2024) · cites this paper as [98]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Davis, L., & Kurzban, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Lisa
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- University of Nebraska Press
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-232
- ISSN
- 1548-7768 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7776
- OpenAlex
- W2052510549
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, severe mental illness, psychosis, self-efficacy, psychiatric hospitalization, symptom distress, resilience, self-determination, mechanisms of change, construct validity, adaptive coping, mental health promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review