Cited by 101Cyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A CFD Study on the Prediction of Cyclone Collection Efficiency

Gimbun, Jolius, Chuah, T. G., Choong, Thomas S. Y., Fakhru'l-Razi, A.·2005·International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics

Abstract

This work presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics calculation to predict and to evaluate the effects of temperature, operating pressure and inlet velocity on the collection efficiency of gas cyclones. The numerical solutions were carried out using spreadsheet and commercial CFD code FLUENT 6.0. This paper also reviews four empirical models for the prediction of cyclone collection efficiency, namely Lapple [1 Lapple, C. E. 1951. Chem. Eng., 58: 144 [Google Scholar]], Koch and Licht [2 Koch, W. H. and Licht, W. 1977. Chem. Eng., 7: 80 [Google Scholar]], Li and Wang [3 Li, Enliang and Wang, Yingmin. 1989. A.I.Ch.E. J., 35: 666 [Google Scholar]], and Iozia and Leith [4 Iozia, D. L. and Leith, D. 1990. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12: 598 [CSA][Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. All the predictions proved to be satisfactory when compared with the presented experimental data. The CFD simulations predict the cyclone cut-off size for all operating conditions with a deviation of 3.7% from the experimental data. Specifically, results obtained from the computer modelling exercise have demonstrated that CFD model is the best method of modelling the cyclones collection efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15502280590923649

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Lapple C. E., 1951, Chem. Eng., 58, 144
  2. Koch W. H., 1977, Chem. Eng., 7, 80
  3. 10.1002/aic.690350419 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/02786829008959373 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0032-5910(02)00338-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0021-8502(95)00549-8 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0255-2701(03)00079-5 · DOI
  8. Fredriksson C., 1999, Exploratory experimental and theoretical studies of cyclone gasification of wood powder
  9. Gimbun J., Chem. Eng. Process
  10. Crowe C. T., 1998, Multiphase Flow with Droplets and Particles.
  11. 10.1017/S0022112072001806 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7 · DOI
  13. Barth W., 1956, Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft, 8, 1
  14. 10.1080/02786829008959410 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/02786828508959066 · DOI
  16. Mothes H., 1982, J. Aerosol Sci., 13, 184
  17. 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00543-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0255-2701(94)04001-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gimbun, J., Chuah, T. G., Choong, T. S. Y., & Fakhru'l-Razi, A.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics
Published
2005-07
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
161-168
ISSN
  • 1550-2287 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2295
OpenAlex
W2038664081
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Keywords
gas cyclone, cut-off size, temperature effects, operating pressure, inlet velocity, particle separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review