Cited by 73Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDigital Education and Society

A dialogic approach to transform teaching, learning & assessment with generative AI in secondary education: a proof of concept

Open access
Tang, Kok-Sing, Cooper, Grant, Rappa, Natasha, Cooper, Martin, Sims, Craig, Nonis, Karen·2024·Pedagogies: An International Journal

Abstract

This paper explores the pedagogical potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in secondary education through a dialogic approach to teaching, learning and assessment. It presents an ongoing action research project in collaboration with a high school in Western Australia, involving four teachers to integrate GenAI in their classrooms. The study aims to develop and evaluate innovative pedagogies for leveraging GenAI to enhance educational practices and student learning outcomes across three action research teams focusing on critical questioning, assessment and differentiation. Drawing on Bakhtin’s concept of heteroglossia, the study conceptualizes GenAI not as a definitive knowledge provider but as a dialogic agent that facilitates collaborative dialogue and co-construction of knowledge among students. This perspective aims to encourage students to critically engage with AI-generated content and integrate multiple viewpoints into their learning, thus fostering key epistemic skills. Initial findings demonstrate active student engagement in dialogues with GenAI, highlighting the use of follow-up questions that indicate critical thinking and creativity. These findings underscore the significance of integrating multiple perspectives and fostering epistemic skills among students, promoting a comprehensive and ethical approach to AI use in education. The research calls for further exploration of GenAI’s pedagogic potential and its broader implications for educational pr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1554480x.2024.2379774

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Authors
Tang, K.-S., Cooper, G., Rappa, N., Cooper, M., Sims, C., & Nonis, K.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tang, Kok-Sing
Venue
Pedagogies: An International Journal
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
493-503
ISSN
  • 1554-480X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-4818
OpenAlex
W4402440122
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Pedagogies An International Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Innovation & Excellence Award
  • Curtin University School of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
generative AI, dialogic teaching, secondary education, heteroglossia, Bakhtin, critical thinking, AI-assisted assessment, differentiated instruction, co-construction of knowledge, student engagement, AI ethics in education, secondary school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review