Cited by 36Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesForensic and Genetic ResearchArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

DNA and Pacific Commensal Models: Applications, Construction, Limitations, and Future Prospects

Open access
Storey, Alice A., Clarke, Andrew C., Ladefoged, Thegn, Robins, Judith, Matisoo-Smith, Elizabeth·2013·The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology

Abstract

Components of the Pacific transported landscape have been used as proxies to trace the prehistoric movement of humans across the Pacific for almost two decades. Analyses of archaeological remains and DNA sequences of plants, animals, and microorganisms moved by or with humans have contributed to understanding prehistoric migration, trade, exchange, and sometimes revealed the geographic origins of particular plants and animals. This paper presents the basic elements of a DNA-based commensal model and discusses the phylogenetic and population genetic approaches these models employ. A clear delineation of the underlying assumptions of these models and the background information required to construct them have yet to appear in the literature. This not only provides a framework with which to construct a commensal model but also highlights gaps in current knowledge. The ways in which commensal models have enriched archaeological reconstructions will be highlighted, as will their current limitations. With these limitations in mind, options will be outlined for augmenting commensal models through the application of established techniques and new technologies in order to provide the best tools for reconstructing ancient human mobility and behavior in the Pacific and beyond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15564894.2012.761299

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A total of 596 individuals (408 modern and 188 ancient) from commensal animals have been published, in most cases portions of mtDNA.

    “A total of 596 individuals-408 modern and 188 ancient-have been published; in most cases portions mtDNA.”

    From Dispersal, Isolation, and Interaction in the Islands of Polynesia: A Critical Review of Archaeological and Genetic Evidence (2017) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Commensal Database (p. 20) says the paper compiles published DNA data for commensal organisms, distinguishing modern and ancient sources. The Introduction (p. 4) describes Table 1 as counts of individual sequences or genotypes, and Documenting the Characteristics of a Transported Organism (p. 15) says mtDNA regions are often used in commensal studies. The passages do not establish the claimed total of 596 or its 408-modern, 188-ancient breakdown; searches for those numbers did not verify them. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 169 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Agostini, H., R. Yanagihara, V. Davis, C. F. Ryschkewitsch, and G. L. Stoner. 1997. Asian genotypesofJCvirusinnativeAmericansandin a Pacific island population: Markers of viral evolution and human migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:1454214546.
  2. Baldwin, J. A. 1990. Muruk, dok, pik, kakaruk: Prehistoric implication of geographical distributions in the southwest Pacific. In Pacific Production Systems: Approaches to Economic Prehistory (D. E. Yen and J. M. J. Mummery, eds.):231-257. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
  3. Beaglehole,J.C.(ed.).1962. TheEndeavourJournal of Joseph Banks 1768-1771 . Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Angus & Robertson.
  4. Becker, C. 1997. Zooarqueolog´ ıa y etnohistoria: Una contrastaci´ on en Isla Mocha. In La Isla de las Palabras Rotas (D. Quiroz and M. S´ anchez, eds.) Santiago: Centro de Investigaciones Dego Barros Arana.
  5. Bulmer, S. 2001. Lapita dogs and singing dogs and the history of the dog in New Guinea. In The Archaeology of Lapita Dispersal in Oceania: Papers from the Fourth Lapita Conference (G. Clark, A. Anderson, and T. Vunidilo, eds.):183-201. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
  6. Clarke, A. C. 2009. Origins and Dispersal of the Sweet Potato and Bottle Gourd in Oceania: Implications for prehistoric human mobility. Ph.D. Dissertation. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
  7. Davidson, J. M. 1969. Excavation of a coastal midden deposit, SU-LO-1. In Archaeology in Western Samoa (R. C. Green and J. Davidson, eds.):224-252. Auckland: Auckland Institute and Museum.
  8. de France, S. D., W. F. Keegan, and L. A. Newsom 1996. The archaeobotanical, bone isotope, and zooarchaeological records from Carribean sites in comparative perspective. In Case Studies in Environmental Archaeology (E. J. Reitz, L. A. Newson,andS.J.Scudder,eds.):289-304.New York: Plenum Press.
  9. Giovas, C. M., M. J. LeFebvre, and S. M. Fitzpatrick 2012.Newrecordsforprehistoricintroduction of Neotropical mammals to the West Indies: Evidence from Carriacou, Lesser Antilles. Journal of Biogeography 39(3):476-487.
  10. Green, R. C. 2005. Sweet potato transfers in Polynesianprehistory. In TheSweetPotatoinOceania: A Reappraisal (C. Ballard, P. Brown, R. M. Bourke, and T. Harwood, eds.):43-62. Sydney, Australia: Centatime.
  11. Haile, J., R. Holdaway, K. Oliver, M. Bunce, M. T. P. Gilbert, R. Nielsen, K. Munch, S. Y. W. Ho, B. Shapiro, and E. Willerslev. 2007. Ancient DNAchronologywithinsedimentdeposits:Are paleobiological reconstructions possible and is DNAleaching a factor? Molecular Biology and Evolution 24(4):982-989.
  12. Horai, S., K. Hayasaka, R. Kondo, K. Tsungane, and N. Takahata. 1995. Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequencesofhominoidmitochondrialDNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92:532-536.
  13. Intoh, M. 1992. WhywerepotsimportedtoNgulu atoll? A consideration of subsistence strategy. Journal of the Polynesian Sociery 101(2):159168.
  14. Jokhan, A. D. and P. McLenachan. 2004. Genetic fingerprintingofFijiankava. SouthPacificJournal of Natural Sciences 22(1):41-43.
  15. Ladefoged, T. N., M. D. McCoy, G. P. Asner, P. V. Kirch, C. O. Puleston, O. A. Chadwick, and P. M. Vitousek. 2011. Agricultural potential and actualizeddevelopmentinHawai'i:Anairborne LiDAR survey of the leeward Kohala field system (Hawai'i island). Journal of Archaeological Science 38:3605-3619.
  16. Lepofsky, D., H. C. Harries, and M. Kellum. 1992.EarlycoconutsonMo'oreaisland,French Polynesia. Journal of the Polynesian Society 101:299-308.
  17. Lum, J. K. and R. L. Cann. 2000. MtDNA lineage analyses: Origins and migrations of Micronesians and Polynesians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 113(2):151-168.
  18. Matisoo-Smith, E. 1994. The human colonisation of Polynesia-Anovelapproach:GeneticanalysesofthePolynesianrat( Rattusexulans ). Journal of the Polynesian Society 103:75-87.
  19. Matisoo-Smith, E., M. Hingston, G. Summerhayes, J. Robins, H. Ross, and M. Hendy. 2009. On the rat trail in Near Oceania. Pacific Science 63(4):465-475.
  20. Matisoo-Smith, E. and J. H. Robins. 2004. Origins and dispersals of Pacific peoples: Evidence frommtDNAphylogeniesofthePacificrat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(24):9167-9172.
  21. Mills, C. 2004. Dogs of Rarotonga. Discover 25(6):70-77.
  22. Moodley, Y., B. Linz, Y. Yamaoka, H. M. Windsor, S. Breurec, J.-Y. Wu, A. Maady, et al. 2009. The peoplingofthePacificfromabacterialperspective. Science 323(5913):527-530.
  23. Nagaoka, L. 1988. Lapita subsistence: The evidence of non-fish archaeofaunal remains. In Archaeology of the Lapita Cultural Complex: A Critical Review (P. V. Kirch and T. L. Hunt, eds.):117-134. Seattle: Burke Museum.
  24. Nui) of Easter Island Journal of General Virology 80:1995-2001.
  25. Orliac, C. and M. Orliac. 1998. The disappearance of Easter Island's forest: Over-exploitation or climatic catastrophe? In Easter Island in Pacific Context. South Seas Symposium: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Easter Island and East Polynesia (C. M. Stevenson, G. Lee, and F. J. Morin, eds.):129134. Los Osos, CA: Bearsville and Cloud Mountain Presses, Easter Island Foundation.
  26. Oskarsson, M. C. R., C. F. C. Kl¨ utsch, U. Boonyaprakob, A. Wilton, Y. Tanabe, and P. Savolainen. 2011. Mitochondrial DNA data indicateanintroductionthroughmainlandSoutheast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 279(1730):967-974.
  27. Reitz, E. J. and E. S. Wing. 1999. Zooarchaeology . NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Rezza, G., R. T. Danaya, T. M. Wagner, L. Sarmati, I. L. Owen, P. Monin, M. Andreoni, B. Suligoi, B. Ensoli, and E. Pozio. 2001. Human Herpesvirus8andotherviralinfections,PapuaNewGuinea. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(5):893-895.
  29. Robins, J. H., E. Matisoo-Smith, and L. Furey. 2001.Hitormiss?FactorsaffectingDNApreservation in Pacific archaeological material. In Australasian Connections and New Directions: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Archaeometry Conference (M. Jones and P. J. Sheppard, eds.):295-305. Auckland: The University of Auckland.
  30. Skjølsvold, A. 1961. Site E-2, a circular stone dwelling,Anakena.In ArchaeologyofEasterIsland (T. HeyerdahlandE.N.Ferdon,eds.):295303. Santa Fe: Monograph of the School of American Research and the Museum of New Mexico.
  31. Steadman, D. W. 2006. Extinction and Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Threadgold, J., T. A. Brown 2003. Degradation of DNAinartificially charred wheat seed. Journal of Archaeological Science 30:1067-1076.
  33. Tinghitella, R. M., M. Zuk, M. Beveridge, and L. W. Simmons. 2011. Island hopping introduces Polynesian field crickets to novel environments,geneticbottlenecksandrapidevolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24(6):11991211.
  34. Titcomb, M. and M. K. Pukui. 1969. DogandMan in the Ancient Pacific, with Special Attention to Hawai'i . Honolulu: Star-Bulletin Print Co.
  35. Vos,P.,R.Hogers,M.Bleeker,M.Reijans,T.vande Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, et al. 1995. AFLP: A newtechniqueforDNAfingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23(21):4407-4414.
  36. Whistler, W. A. 1991. Polynesian plant introductions. In Islands, Plants, and Polynesians: An Introduction to Polynesian Ethnobotany (P. A. Cox and S. A. Banack, eds.):41-66. Portland: Dioscorides Press.
  37. Wing, E. S. 1993. The realm between wild and doemstic. In Skeletons in Her Cupboard: Festschrift for Juliet Clutton-Brock (A. Clason, S. Payne, and H. P. Uerpmann, eds.):243-250. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  38. Yen, D. E. 1991. Domestication: The lessons from NewGuinea. In ManandaHalf: Essays in Pacific Anthropology and Ethnobiology in HonourofRalphBulmer (A.Pawley,ed.):558-569. Auckland: Polynesian Society.
  39. Zhang, D. P., G. Rossel, A. Kriegner, and R. Hijmans. 2004. AFLP assessment of diversity in sweetpotatofromLatinAmericaandthePacific region: Its implications on the dispersal of the crop. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51(2):115-120.
  40. Zi ↪ etkiewicz, E., A. Rafalski, and D. Labuda. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat(SSR)-anchoredpolymerasechainreaction amplification. Genomics 20(2):176-183.

Authors
Storey, A. A., Clarke, A. C., Ladefoged, T., Robins, J., & Matisoo-Smith, E.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Allan Wilson Centre (NZ)
Venue
The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology
Published
2013-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
37-65
ISSN
  • 1556-1828 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4894
OpenAlex
W2063039233
Cited by
36
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
30.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Pacific prehistory, phylogenetic analysis, population genetics, archaeological reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review