Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment
Abstract
Emerging transportation technologies have the potential to significantly reshape the transportation systems and household vehicle ownership. Key among these transportation technologies are the autonomous vehicles, particularly when introduced in shared vehicle fleets. In this paper, we focus on the potential impact that fleets of shared autonomous vehicles might have on household vehicle ownership. To obtain initial insights into this issue, we asked a sample of university personnel and members of the American Automobile Association as to how likely they would consider relinquishing one of their household's personal vehicles if shared autonomous vehicles were available (thus reducing their household vehicle ownership level by one). For single-vehicle households, this would be relinquishing their only vehicle, and for multivehicle households (households owning two or more vehicles) this would be relinquishing just one of their vehicles. Possible responses to the question about relinquishing a household vehicle if shared autonomous vehicles are present are: extremely unlikely, unlikely, unsure, likely, and extremely likely. To determine the factors that influence this response, random parameters ordered probit models are estimated to account for the likelihood that considerable unobserved heterogeneity is likely to be present in the data. The findings show that a wide range of socioeconomic factors affects people's likelihood of vehicle relinquishment in the presence of shared…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
27.5% of the 1214 respondents surveyed are extremely unlikely and 26.7% are unlikely to relinquish their personal vehicle.
“Menon et al. (2018) have found that 27.5% of the 1214 respondents surveyed are extremely unlikely and 26.7% are unlikely to relinquish their personal vehicle.”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Menon et al., 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A. R., & Mannering, F.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Tongji University (CN)
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Yu
- Venue
- International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-122
- ISSN
- 1556-8318 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-8334
- OpenAlex
- W2791688454
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sustainable Transportation (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- shared autonomous vehicles, household car ownership, gender differences, generational differences, commuting patterns, travel behavior, public opinion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review