Cited by 181Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment

Menon, Nikhil, Barbour, Natalia, Zhang, Yu, Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, Mannering, Fred·2019·International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

Abstract

Emerging transportation technologies have the potential to significantly reshape the transportation systems and household vehicle ownership. Key among these transportation technologies are the autonomous vehicles, particularly when introduced in shared vehicle fleets. In this paper, we focus on the potential impact that fleets of shared autonomous vehicles might have on household vehicle ownership. To obtain initial insights into this issue, we asked a sample of university personnel and members of the American Automobile Association as to how likely they would consider relinquishing one of their household's personal vehicles if shared autonomous vehicles were available (thus reducing their household vehicle ownership level by one). For single-vehicle households, this would be relinquishing their only vehicle, and for multivehicle households (households owning two or more vehicles) this would be relinquishing just one of their vehicles. Possible responses to the question about relinquishing a household vehicle if shared autonomous vehicles are present are: extremely unlikely, unlikely, unsure, likely, and extremely likely. To determine the factors that influence this response, random parameters ordered probit models are estimated to account for the likelihood that considerable unobserved heterogeneity is likely to be present in the data. The findings show that a wide range of socioeconomic factors affects people's likelihood of vehicle relinquishment in the presence of shared…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15568318.2018.1443178

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 27.5% of the 1214 respondents surveyed are extremely unlikely and 26.7% are unlikely to relinquish their personal vehicle.

    “Menon et al. (2018) have found that 27.5% of the 1214 respondents surveyed are extremely unlikely and 26.7% are unlikely to relinquish their personal vehicle.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Menon et al., 2018

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 181

Authors
Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A. R., & Mannering, F.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yu
Venue
International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
Published
2018-03-15
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
111-122
ISSN
  • 1556-8318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-8334
OpenAlex
W2791688454
Cited by
181
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sustainable Transportation (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
shared autonomous vehicles, household car ownership, gender differences, generational differences, commuting patterns, travel behavior, public opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review