The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci
Open accessAbstract
We present an expanded multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes. The final data matrix consisted of four loci (nuc SSU rDNA, nuc LSU rDNA, TEF1, RPB2) for 96 taxa, representing five of the seven orders in the current classification of Dothideomycetes and several outgroup taxa representative of the major clades in the Pezizomycotina. The resulting phylogeny differentiated two main dothideomycete lineages comprising the pseudoparaphysate Pleosporales and aparaphysate Dothideales. We propose the subclasses Pleosporomycetidae (order Pleosporales) and Dothideomycetidae (orders Dothideales, Capnodiales and Myriangiales). Furthermore we provide strong molecular support for the placement of Mycosphaerellaceae and Piedraiaceae within the Capnodiales and introduce Davidiellaceae as a new family to accommodate species of Davidiella with Cladosporium anamorphs. Some taxa could not be placed with certainty (e.g. Hysteriales), but there was strong support for new groupings. The clade containing members of the genera Botryosphaeria and Guignardia resolved well but without support for any relationship to any other described orders and we hereby propose the new order Botryosphaeriales. These data also are consistent with the removal of Chaetothyriales and Coryneliales from the Dothideomycetes and strongly support their placement in the Eurotiomycetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi
Hibbett, D. S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J. F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P. F., Eriksson, O. E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P. M., Lücking, R., et al. (2007) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citationFungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Introducing the Consolidated Species Concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae
Quaedvlieg, W., Binder, M., Groenewald, J. Z., Summerell, B. A., Carnegie, A. J., Burgess, T. I., & Crous, P. W. (2014) · Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi · doi:10.3767/003158514x681981 · Cited by 347
Self-citationMulti-locus phylogeny of Pleosporales: a taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary re-evaluation
Zhang, Y., Schoch, C. L., Fournier, J., Crous, P. W., de Gruyter, J., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Hirayama, K., Tanaka, K., Pointing, S. B., Spatafora, J. W., et al. (2009) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim.2009.64.04 · Cited by 296
Self-citationTowards a natural classification of Botryosphaeriales
Liu, J.-K., Phookamsak, R., Doilom, M., Wikee, S., Li, Y.-M., Ariyawansha, H., Boonmee, S., Chomnunti, P., Dai, D.-Q., Bhat, J. D., et al. (2012) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0207-4 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoch, C. L., Shoemaker, R. A., Seifert, K. A., Hambleton, S., Spatafora, J. W., & Crous, P. W.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1041-1052
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-2536
- OpenAlex
- W4230059922
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832632
- The paper
- Schoch, C. L., Shoemaker, R. A., Seifert, K. A., Hambleton, S., Spatafora, J. W., & Crous, P. W. (2006). A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.